Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635819›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy.

Nadim Tayeh, Anthony Klein, Marie-Christine Le Paslier, Françoise Jacquin, Hervé Houtin, Céline Rond, Marianne Chabert-Martinello, Jean-Bernard Magnin-Robert, Pascal Marget, Grégoire Aubert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Harnessing historical genebank data to accelerate pea breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic prediction for rust resistance in pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A comparison of methods for training population optimization in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Seed Coat's Impact on Crop Performance in Pea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nadim TayehINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Anthony KleinINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Marie-Christine Le PaslierINRA, US1279 Etude du Polymorphisme des Génomes Végétaux, CEA-IG/Centre National de Génotypage Evry, France.
Françoise JacquinINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Hervé HoutinINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Céline RondINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Marianne Chabert-MartinelloINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Jean-Bernard Magnin-RobertINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Pascal MargetINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Grégoire AubertINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.
Judith BurstinINRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pea is an important food and feed crop and a valuable component of low-input farming systems. Improving resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is a major breeding target to enhance yield potential and regularity. Genomic selection (GS) has lately emerged as a promising technique to increase the accuracy and gain of marker-based selection. It uses genome-wide molecular marker data to predict the breeding values of candidate lines to selection. A collection of 339 genetic resource accessions (CRB339) was subjected to high-density genotyping using the GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array. Genomic prediction accuracy was evaluated for thousand seed weight (TSW), the number of seeds per plant (NSeed), and the date of flowering (BegFlo). Mean cross-environment prediction accuracies reached 0.83 for TSW, 0.68 for NSeed, and 0.65 for BegFlo. For each trait, the statistical method, the marker density, and/or the training population size and composition used for prediction were varied to investigate their effects on prediction accuracy: the effect was large for the size and composition of the training population but limited for the statistical method and marker density. Maximizing the relatedness between individuals in the training and test sets, through the CDmean-based method, significantly improved prediction accuracies. A cross-population cross-validation experiment was further conducted using the CRB339 collection as a training population set and nine recombinant inbred lines populations as test set. Prediction quality was high with mean Q (2) of 0.44 for TSW and 0.59 for BegFlo. Results are discussed in the light of current efforts to develop GS strategies in pea.

Indexed as

genomic selectionGenoPea 13.2K SNP Arraymarker densitypea (Pisum sativum L.)prediction accuracytraining set

Identifiers

PMID26635819
PMCPMC4648083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.