Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635814›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2015

Macrophages During the Fibrotic Process: M2 as Friend and Foe.

Tarcio Teodoro Braga, Juan Sebastian Henao Agudelo, Niels Olsen Saraiva Camara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 452 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tissue signatures of human macrophages during homeostasis and activation.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Targeted lungScience advances · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tarcio Teodoro BragaNephrology Division, Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Juan Sebastian Henao AgudeloImmunology Department, University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Niels Olsen Saraiva CamaraNephrology Division, Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil ; Immunology Department, University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil ; Renal Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages play essential activities in homeostasis maintenance during different organism's conditions. They may be polarized according to various stimuli, which subsequently subdivide them into distinct populations. Macrophages with inflammatory activity function mainly during pathological context, while those with regulatory activity control inflammation and also remodel the repairing process. Here, we propose to review and to present a concise discuss on the role of different components during tissue repair, including those related to innate immune receptors and metabolic modifications. The scar formation is directly related to the degree of inflammation, but also with the appearance of M2 macrophages. In spite of greater numbers of macrophages in the fibrotic phase, regulatory macrophages present some characteristics related to promotion of fibrosis but also with the control of scar formation. These regulatory macrophages present an oxidative metabolism, and differ from the initial inflammatory macrophages, which in turn, present a glycolytic characteristic, which allow regulatory ones to optimize the oxygen consumption and minimizing their ROS production. We will emphasize the difference in macrophage subpopulations and the origin and plasticity of these cells during fibrotic processes.

Indexed as

cell metabolismfibrosismacrophage activationmyofibroblastspolarization

Identifiers

PMID26635814
PMCPMC4658431
OpenAlexW2174617543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.