Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635807›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2015

Clinical Outlook for Type-1 and FOXP3(+) T Regulatory Cell-Based Therapy.

Silvia Gregori, Laura Passerini, Maria-Grazia Roncarolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sublingual immunotherapy for 4 years increased the number of Foxp3Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Reprogrammed CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Combination Therapy Is the New Gene Therapy?Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Early Growth Response Gene 2-Expressing CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. IL-10-Engineered Human CD4Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Silvia GregoriDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (TIGET) , Milan , Italy.
Laura PasseriniDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (TIGET) , Milan , Italy.
Maria-Grazia RoncaroloDepartment of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine , Palo Alto, CA , USA.

Funding

Telethon TGT11E02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T regulatory cells (Tregs) are subsets of T lymphocytes specialized in modulating antigen-specific immune responses in vivo. Hence, Tregs represent an ideal therapeutic tool to control detrimental immune reactions. Based on solid pre-clinical results, investigators started testing the safety and efficacy of Treg-based therapies in humans. Despite promising results, a number of issues remain to be solved. We will discuss the results obtained from clinical trials and the challenges and risks we are facing in the further development of Treg-based therapies.

Indexed as

FOXP3gene transferIL-10toleranceTreg-based therapyT regulatory cellsT regulatory type 1 cells

Identifiers

PMID26635807
PMCPMC4658444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.