Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635774›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2015

The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Charles J Newbold, Gabriel de la Fuente, Alejandro Belanche, Eva Ramos-Morales, Neil R McEwan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Gut protist diversity in Eurasian beavers (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Colostrum Source, Dose and Processing onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles J NewboldInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University , Aberystwyth, UK.
Gabriel de la FuenteDepartament de Producció Animal, Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Agrària, Universitat de Lleida , Lleida, Spain.
Alejandro BelancheInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University , Aberystwyth, UK.
Eva Ramos-MoralesInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University , Aberystwyth, UK.
Neil R McEwanInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University , Aberystwyth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First described in 1843, Rumen protozoa with their striking appearance were assumed to be important for the welfare of their host. However, despite contributing up to 50% of the bio-mass in the rumen, the role of protozoa in rumen microbial ecosystem remains unclear. Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA libraries generated from the rumen of cattle, sheep, and goats has revealed an unexpected diversity of ciliated protozoa although variation in gene copy number between species makes it difficult to obtain absolute quantification. Despite repeated attempts it has proven impossible to maintain rumen protozoa in axenic culture. Thus it has been difficult to establish conclusively a role of ciliate protozoa in rumen fiber degradation. The development of techniques to clone and express ciliate genes in λ phage, together with bioinformatic indices to confirm the ciliate origin of the genes has allowed the isolation and characterization of fibrolytic genes from rumen protozoa. Elimination of the ciliate protozoa increases microbial protein supply by up to 30% and reduces methane production by up to 11%. Our recent findings suggest that holotrich protozoa play a disproportionate role in supporting methanogenesis whilst the small Entodinium are responsible for much of the bacterial protein turnover. As yet no method to control protozoa in the rumen that is safe and practically applicable has been developed, however a range of plant extract capable of controlling if not completely eliminating rumen protozoa have been described.

Indexed as

defaunationmethanemicrobial diversityprotozoarumen

Identifiers

PMID26635774
PMCPMC4659874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.