Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635734›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2015

Environmental and Sanitary Conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro.

Giovana O Fistarol, Felipe H Coutinho, Ana Paula B Moreira, Tainá Venas, Alba Cánovas, Sérgio E M de Paula, Ricardo Coutinho, Rodrigo L de Moura, Jean Louis Valentin, Denise R Tenenbaum and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic signatures of resistance and adaptability in Aeromonas and Pseudomonas from a Brazilian Hope Spot.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  8. Unveiling pathogenicity and resistance profiles of non-cholera Vibrio from an urban estuary.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hiding in Plain Sight: Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. New Occurrences of the Tiger Shark (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Fast screening of enteropathogens in marine water samples.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Giovana O FistarolInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Laboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Felipe H CoutinhoInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Ana Paula B MoreiraInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tainá VenasInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alba CánovasLaboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sérgio E M de PaulaLaboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ricardo CoutinhoInstituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo L de MouraInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jean Louis ValentinInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Denise R TenenbaumInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodolfo ParanhosInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rogério de A B do ValleLaboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Carolina P VicenteOswaldo Cruz Institute, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gilberto M Amado FilhoInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Renato Crespo PereiraLaboratory of Marine Chemical Ecology, Insitute of Biology, Federal Fluminense University Niteroi, Brazil.
Ricardo KrugerLaboratory of Enzimology, Institute of Biology, University of Brasília Brasília, Brazil.
Carlos E RezendeLaboratory of Environmental Sciences (LCA-UENF), Campos Brazil.
Cristiane C ThompsonInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo S SalomonInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Laboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabiano L ThompsonInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Laboratório de Sistemas Avançados de Gestão da Produção, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanabara Bay is the second largest bay in the coast of Brazil, with an area of 384 km(2). In its surroundings live circa 16 million inhabitants, out of which 6 million live in Rio de Janeiro city, one of the largest cities of the country, and the host of the 2016 Olympic Games. Anthropogenic interference in Guanabara Bay area started early in the XVI century, but environmental impacts escalated from 1930, when this region underwent an industrialization process. Herein we present an overview of the current environmental and sanitary conditions of Guanabara Bay, a consequence of all these decades of impacts. We will focus on microbial communities, how they may affect higher trophic levels of the aquatic community and also human health. The anthropogenic impacts in the bay are flagged by heavy eutrophication and by the emergence of pathogenic microorganisms that are either carried by domestic and/or hospital waste (e.g., virus, KPC-producing bacteria, and fecal coliforms), or that proliferate in such conditions (e.g., vibrios). Antibiotic resistance genes are commonly found in metagenomes of Guanabara Bay planktonic microorganisms. Furthermore, eutrophication results in recurrent algal blooms, with signs of a shift toward flagellated, mixotrophic groups, including several potentially harmful species. A recent large-scale fish kill episode, and a long trend decrease in fish stocks also reflects the bay's degraded water quality. Although pollution of Guanabara Bay is not a recent problem, the hosting of the 2016 Olympic Games propelled the government to launch a series of plans to restore the bay's water quality. If all plans are fully implemented, the restoration of Guanabara Bay and its shores may be one of the best legacies of the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.

Indexed as

anthropogenic impactsbacteriaGuanabara Baymicroalgaepollutionsanitary conditions

Identifiers

PMID26635734
PMCPMC4653747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.