Editorial: Using Noise to Characterize Vision.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Line drawings as a tool to probe edge sensitivity in natural scenes.Journal of vision · 2025
   Article
2. Increased color preference through the introduction of luminance noise in chromatic stimuli.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
3. Keep your finger on the pulse: Better rate perception and gap detection with vibrotactile compared to visual stimuli.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
   Article
4. Feeling the Beat (and Seeing It, Too): Vibrotactile, Visual, and Bimodal Rate Discrimination.Multisensory research · 2020
   Article
5. Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is it Due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
   Article
6. The Temporal Window of Visual Processing in Aging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as