Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635604›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2015

Antimicrobial, Anthelmintic Activities and Characterisation of Functional Phenolic Acids of Achyranthes aspera Linn.: A Medicinal Plant Used for the Treatment of Wounds and Ringworm in East Africa.

Ashwell R Ndhlala, Habteab M Ghebrehiwot, Bhekumthetho Ncube, Adeyemi O Aremu, Jiří Gruz, Michaela Šubrtová, Karel Doležal, Christian P du Plooy, Hafiz A Abdelgadir, Johannes Van Staden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Analysis ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Preliminary Phytochemical Composition andEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comprehensive Characterization of Secondary Metabolites fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Chemical Constituents ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  19. Antibacterial Activity of Two Flavans from the Stem Bark ofAdvances in pharmacological sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashwell R NdhlalaResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa ; Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Agricultural Research Council Pretoria, South Africa.
Habteab M GhebrehiwotResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa ; African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Bhekumthetho NcubeResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Adeyemi O AremuResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Jiří GruzDepartment of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palackỳ University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic.
Michaela ŠubrtováDepartment of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palackỳ University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic.
Karel DoležalDepartment of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palackỳ University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic.
Christian P du PlooyVegetable and Ornamental Plants, Agricultural Research Council Pretoria, South Africa.
Hafiz A AbdelgadirResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa ; Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Agricultural Research Council Pretoria, South Africa.
Johannes Van StadenResearch Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAAgricultural Research Council of South Africa · ZACzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achyranthes aspera Linn. (Amaranthaceae) commonly known as Prickly Chaff flower (English) is traditionally used for treating a number of ailments. Different parts of the plant are used in treating wounds and ringworm in East Africa and elsewhere for a number of ailments. In this study, leaf extracts of A. aspera collected from two different geographical locations (Ciaat, Eritrea and Ukulinga, South Africa) were evaluated for antibacterial, antifungal, anthelmintic activities and the plant characterized for functional phenolic acids as well as protein binding capacity. The pathogens used in the tests were, two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae), two Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus), a filamentus yeast-like fungus (Candida albicans) and a free-living nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans). The water and acetone extracts of the samples collected from Ciaat exhibited good antibacterial, antifungal and anthelmintic activity (MIC < 1 mg/ml) except the water extract against E. coli which showed moderate activity. In contrast, the extracts collected from Ukulinga exhibited moderate to weak activities except for the acetone (aq.) extracts which had good activity against some of the tested organisms. UHPLC-MS/MS revealed variation in the levels of some functional phenolic compounds, with rutin, chlorogenic acid and genistein not being detected in the extracts from Ukulinga. The variation was also observed in the protein binding capacity, which could offer a predictive wound healing model. All extracts from plant samples collected at Ciaat expressed significant dominant potency compared to similar extracts from Ukulinga.

Indexed as

Amaranthaceaechlorogenic acidgenisteinprotein bindingrutintaxifolinwound healing

Identifiers

PMID26635604
PMCPMC4655238
OpenAlexW2183530239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.