ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2015
Drosophila Bitter Taste(s).
Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome Analysis of the Brain and Gnathal Ganglion Reveals Feeding-Mediated Genes inBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Taste evolution in an herbivorous drosophilid.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Diverse mechanisms of taste coding inScience advances · 2023Article
- Adenosine triphosphate overrides the aversive effect of antifeedants and toxicants: a model alternative phagostimulant for sugar-based vector control tools.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Molecular sensors in the taste system of Drosophila.Genes & genomics · 2023Review
- Gustation in insects: taste qualities and types of evidence used to show taste function of specific body parts.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2023Article
- Circulating fructose regulates a germline stem cell increase via gustatory receptor-mediated gut hormone secretion in matedScience advances · 2023Article
- Taste adaptations associated with host specialization in the specialist Drosophila sechellia.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Bacteria-Derived Peptidoglycan Triggers a Noncanonical Nuclear Factor-κB-Dependent Response inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Ir56b is an atypical ionotropic receptor that underlies appetitive salt response in Drosophila.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Review
- Repellency Mechanism of Natural Guar Gum-Based Film Incorporated with Citral against Brown Planthopper,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Chemosensory protein 4 is required forFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Taste sensing and sugar detection mechanisms ineLife · 2021Article
- High-Throughput Feeding Bioassay for Lepidoptera Larvae.Journal of chemical ecology · 2021Article
- The fly liquid-food electroshock assay (FLEA) suggests opposite roles for neuropeptide F in avoidance of bitterness and shock.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Ecological Sensing Through Taste and Chemosensation Mediates Inflammation: A Biological Anthropological Approach.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Review
- Characterization and its implication of a novel taste receptor detecting nutrients in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most animals possess taste receptors neurons detecting potentially noxious compounds. In humans, the ligands which activate these neurons define a sensory space called "bitter". By extension, this term has been used in animals and insects to define molecules which induce aversive responses. In this review, based on our observations carried out in Drosophila, we examine how bitter compounds are detected and if bitter-sensitive neurons respond only to molecules bitter to humans. Like most animals, flies detect bitter chemicals through a specific population of taste neurons, distinct from those responding to sugars or to other modalities. Activating bitter-sensitive taste neurons induces aversive reactions and inhibits feeding. Bitter molecules also contribute to the suppression of sugar-neuron responses and can lead to a complete inhibition of the responses to sugar at the periphery. Since some bitter molecules activate bitter-sensitive neurons and some inhibit sugar detection, bitter molecules are represented by two sensory spaces which are only partially congruent. In addition to molecules which impact feeding, we recently discovered that the activation of bitter-sensitive neurons also induces grooming. Bitter-sensitive neurons of the wings and of the legs can sense chemicals from the gram negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, thus adding another biological function to these receptors. Bitter-sensitive neurons of the proboscis also respond to the inhibitory pheromone, 7-tricosene. Activating these neurons by bitter molecules in the context of sexual encounter inhibits courting and sexual reproduction, while activating these neurons with 7-tricosene in a feeding context will inhibit feeding. The picture that emerges from these observations is that the taste system is composed of detectors which monitor different "categories" of ligands, which facilitate or inhibit behaviors depending on the context (feeding, sexual reproduction, hygienic behavior), thus considerably extending the initial definition of "bitter" tasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.