Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

Perception and Reality: Why a Wholly Empirical Paradigm is Needed to Understand Vision.

Dale Purves, Yaniv Morgenstern, William T Wojtach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Consumer Contextual Decision-Making Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. On the Character of Consciousness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  10. The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning What to See in a Changing World.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dale PurvesDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.
Yaniv MorgensternDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore.
William T WojtachDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University Durham, NC, USA ; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central puzzle in vision science is how perceptions that are routinely at odds with physical measurements of real world properties can arise from neural responses that nonetheless lead to effective behaviors. Here we argue that the solution depends on: (1) rejecting the assumption that the goal of vision is to recover, however imperfectly, properties of the world; and (2) replacing it with a paradigm in which perceptions reflect biological utility based on past experience rather than objective features of the environment. Present evidence is consistent with the conclusion that conceiving vision in wholly empirical terms provides a plausible way to understand what we see and why.

Indexed as

Bayesian probabilityefficient codingempirical rankingfeature detectionvisionvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID26635546
PMCPMC4649043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.