Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635327›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016

Calibrating well-being, quality of life and common mental disorder items: psychometric epidemiology in public mental health research.

Jan R Böhnke, Tim J Croudace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analyzing quality of life among people with opioid use disorder from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Data Share initiative: implications for decision making.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  15. The structure of well-being: a single underlying factor with genetic and environmental influences.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan R BöhnkeJan R. Böhnke, Dr. rer. nat., Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York; Tim J. Croudace, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), DipAppPsych, School of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK jan.boehnke@york.ac.uk.
Tim J CroudaceJan R. Böhnke, Dr. rer. nat., Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York; Tim J. Croudace, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), DipAppPsych, School of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of 'general health and well-being' in public mental health research stimulates debates around relative merits of questionnaire instruments and their items. Little evidence regarding alignment or differential advantages of instruments or items has appeared to date.

aimsPopulation-based psychometric study of items employed in public mental health narratives.

methodMultidimensional item response theory was applied to General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and EQ-5D items (Health Survey for England, 2010-2012; n = 19 290).

resultsA bifactor model provided the best account of the data and showed that the GHQ-12 and WEMWBS items assess mainly the same construct. Only one item of the EQ-5D showed relevant overlap with this dimension (anxiety/depression). Findings were corroborated by comparisons with alternative models and cross-validation analyses.

conclusionsThe consequences of this lack of differentiation (GHQ-12 v. WEMWBS) for mental health and well-being narratives deserves discussion to enrich debates on priorities in public mental health and its assessment.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeHealth Services ResearchHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPsychometricsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID26635327
PMCPMC4967770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.