Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635308›Full record

ArticleInhalation toxicology2015

Acute effects of acrolein in human volunteers during controlled exposure.

Aishwarya M Dwivedi, Gunnar Johanson, Johnny C Lorentzen, Lena Palmberg, Bengt Sjögren, Lena Ernstgård

Open access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Inhalation toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  3. Formaldehyde and asthma: a plausibility?Archives of toxicology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A rabbit model for evaluating ocular damage from acrolein toxicity in vivo.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aishwarya M Dwivedia Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden and.
Gunnar Johansona Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden and.
Johnny C Lorentzena Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden and.
Lena Palmbergb Lung and Airway Research, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Bengt Sjögrena Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden and.
Lena Ernstgårda Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden and.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAcrolein is a reactive aldehyde mainly formed by combustion. The critical effect is considered to be irritation of the eyes and airways; however, the scarce data available make it difficult to assess effect levels.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to determine thresholds for acute irritation for acrolein.

methodsNine healthy volunteers of each sex were exposed at six occasions for 2 h at rest to: clean air, 15 ppm ethyl acetate (EA), and 0.05 ppm and 0.1 ppm acrolein with and without EA (15 ppm) to mask the potential influence of odor. Symptoms related to irritation and central nervous system effects were rated on 100-mm Visual Analogue Scales.

resultsThe ratings of eye irritation were slightly but significantly increased during exposure to acrolein in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.001, Friedman test) with a median rating of 8 mm (corresponding to "hardly at all") at the 0.1 ppm condition and with no influence from EA. No significant exposure-related effects were found for pulmonary function, or nasal swelling, nor for markers of inflammation and coagulation in blood (IL-6, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and Clara cell protein) or induced sputum (cell count, differential cell count, IL-6 and IL-8). Blink frequency recorded by electromyography was increased during exposure to 0.1 ppm acrolein alone but not during any of the other five exposure conditions.

conclusionBased on subjective ratings, the present study showed minor eye irritation by exposure to 0.1 ppm acrolein.

Indexed as

AcroleinBiomarkersBlood CoagulationCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEye DiseasesFemaleHumansInflammationMaleOdorantsPilot ProjectsSputumAcroleinBiomarkersHuman exposureindoor airinduced sputuminflammationirritationsmellsubjective ratings

Identifiers

PMID26635308
PMCPMC4732413
OpenAlexW2186662450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.