Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26635039›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2016

Prospective long-term minimal residual disease monitoring using RQ-PCR in RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive acute myeloid leukemia: results of the French CBF-2006 trial.

Christophe Willekens, Odile Blanchet, Aline Renneville, Pascale Cornillet-Lefebvre, Cécile Pautas, Romain Guieze, Norbert Ifrah, Hervé Dombret, Eric Jourdan, Claude Preudhomme and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00428558 (A Phase 3 Trial of Systematic Versus Response-adapted Timed-Sequential Induction in Patients With Core Binding Factor), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00428558 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Trial of Systematic Versus Response-adapted Timed-Sequential Induction in Patients With Core Binding Factor (CBF) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2007 to 2011Enrolled200ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsChemotherapy (DAUNORUBICINE-CYTARABINE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Mutation- and MRD-informed treatment decisions for the transplant-eligible AML patient.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Optimizing outcomes in secondary AML.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christophe WillekensMaladie du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.
Odile BlanchetDépartement Hématologie-Immunologie CHU Angers, Tumor Bank CHU-ICO, CRB-CHU Angers, BB-0033-00038, UMR Inserm 892 CNRS 6299 CRCNA, Université d'Anger, France.
Aline RennevilleLaboratoire d'hématologie, Centre de Biologie-Pathologie, CHRU de Lille; Equipe 3 INSERM U837, JPARC Lille, France.
Pascale Cornillet-LefebvreLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, France.
Cécile PautasHématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Romain GuiezeHématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Norbert IfrahHématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers, France.
Hervé DombretDépartement d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, EA3518, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, Université Paris 7, France.
Eric JourdanService d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, France.
Claude PreudhommeLaboratoire d'hématologie, Centre de Biologie-Pathologie, CHRU de Lille; Equipe 3 INSERM U837, JPARC Lille, France.
Nicolas Boissel
French AML Intergroup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia, the prognostic value of early minimal residual disease assessed with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most important prognostic factor, but how long-term minimal residual disease monitoring may contribute to drive individual patient decisions remains poorly investigated. In the multicenter CBF-2006 study, a prospective monitoring of peripheral blood and bone marrow samples was performed every 3 months and every year, respectively, for 2 years following intensive chemotherapy in 94 patients in first complete remission. A complete molecular remission was defined as a (RUNX1-RUNX1T1/ABL1)×100 ≤ 0.001%. After the completion of consolidation therapy, a bone marrow complete molecular remission was observed in 30% of the patients, but was not predictive of subsequent relapse. Indeed, 8 patients (9%) presented a positive bone marrow minimal residual disease for up to 2 years of follow-up while still remaining in complete remission. Conversely, a peripheral blood complete molecular remission was statistically associated with a lower risk of relapse whatever the time-point considered after the completion of consolidation therapy. During the 2-year follow-up, the persistence of peripheral blood complete molecular remission was associated with a lower risk of relapse (4-year cumulative incidence, 8.2%), while molecular relapse confirmed on a subsequent peripheral blood sample predicted hematological relapse (4-year cumulative incidence, 86.9%) within a median time interval of 3.9 months. In t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia, minimal residual disease monitoring on peripheral blood every 3 months allows for the prediction of hematological relapse, and to identify patients who could potentially benefit from intervention therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID #NCT00428558).

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBlood CellsBone MarrowChromosomes, Human, Pair 22Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Consolidation ChemotherapyCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitCytoskeletal ProteinsFemaleFranceGene ExpressionHumansABI1 protein, humanAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitCytoskeletal ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsRUNX1 protein, humanRUNX1T1 protein, humanRUNX1 Translocation Partner 1 ProteinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26635039
PMCPMC4815724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.