Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26634437›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Systematic pan-cancer analysis of tumour purity.

Dvir Aran, Marina Sirota, Atul J Butte

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 781 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
781citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

781 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic Significance ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

721 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dvir AranInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Marina SirotaInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Atul J ButteInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.

Funding

Stanford and Northrop Grumman proposal for the Oncology Models ForumU24CA195858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2015 to 2019
$4.7M
Comparative functional genomics for lung cancer gene discoveryR01CA138256 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTE, ATUL J, SAGE, JULIEN · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138256NCI NIH HHS U24 CA195858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumour microenvironment is the non-cancerous cells present in and around a tumour, including mainly immune cells, but also fibroblasts and cells that comprise supporting blood vessels. These non-cancerous components of the tumour may play an important role in cancer biology. They also have a strong influence on the genomic analysis of tumour samples, and may alter the biological interpretation of results. Here we present a systematic analysis using different measurement modalities of tumour purity in >10,000 samples across 21 cancer types from the Cancer Genome Atlas. Patients are stratified according to clinical features in an attempt to detect clinical differences driven by purity levels. We demonstrate the confounding effect of tumour purity on correlating and clustering tumours with transcriptomics data. Finally, using a differential expression method that accounts for tumour purity, we find an immunotherapy gene signature in several cancer types that is not detected by traditional differential expression analyses.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26634437
PMCPMC4671203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.