Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26634039›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Endoscopic resection of tumors in the lower digestive tract.

Shi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shi-Lun CaiShi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Qiang ShiShi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Tao ChenShi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yun-Shi ZhongShi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Li-Qing YaoShi-Lun Cai, Qiang Shi, Tao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Qing Yao, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As endoscopic technology has developed and matured, the endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract polyps has become a widely used treatment. Colorectal polyps are the most common type of polyp, which are best managed by early resection before the polyp undergoes malignant transformation. Methods for treating colorectal tumors are numerous, including argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery. In this review, we will highlight several currently used clinical endoscopic resection methods and how they are selected based on the characteristics of the targeted tumor. Specifically, we will focus on laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal tumorEndoscopic resection

Identifiers

PMID26634039
PMCPMC4658603
OpenAlexW2424800268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.