Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633890›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Molecular Epidemiology of Amoebiasis: A Cross-Sectional Study among North East Indian Population.

Joyobrato Nath, Sankar Kumar Ghosh, Baby Singha, Jaishree Paul

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections for six years (2015-2020) in Thi-Qar Province, Iraq.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. First Evidence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joyobrato NathDepartment of Zoology, Gurucharan College, Silchar, Assam, India.
Sankar Kumar GhoshDepartment of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India.
Baby SinghaDepartment of Zoology, Gurucharan College, Silchar, Assam, India.
Jaishree PaulSchool of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Assam University · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological studies carried out using culture or microscopy in most of the amoebiasis endemic developing countries, yielded confusing results since none of these could differentiate the pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica from the non-pathogenic Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii. The Northeastern part of India is a hot spot of infection since the climatic conditions are most conducive for the infection and so far no systemic study has been carried out in this region. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsFollowing a cross-sectional study designed during the period 2011-2014, a total of 1260 fecal samples collected from the Northeast Indian population were subjected to microscopy, fecal culture and a sensitive and specific DNA dot blot screening assay developed in our laboratory targeting the Entamoeba spp. Further species discrimination using PCR assay performed in microscopy, culture and DNA dot blot screening positive samples showed E. histolytica an overall prevalence rate of 11.1%, 8.0% and 13.7% respectively. In addition, infection rates of nonpathogenic E. dispar and E. moshkovskii were 11.8% (95% CI = 10.2, 13.8) and 7.8% (95% CI = 6.4, 9.4) respectively. The spatial distributions of infection were 18.2% (107/588) of Assam, 11.7% (23/197) of Manipur, 10.2% (21/207) of Meghalaya, and 8.2% (22/268) of Tripura states. Association study of the disease with demographic features suggested poor living condition (OR = 3.21; 95% CI = 1.83, 5.63), previous history of infection in family member (OR = 3.18; 95% CI = 2.09, 4.82) and unhygienic toilet facility (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.28, 2.49) as significant risk factors for amoebiasis. Children in age group <15 yr, participants having lower levels of education, and daily laborers exhibited a higher infection rate. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the importance of molecular diagnosis of amoebiasis, molecular epidemiological data based on a large sample size from endemic countries are rarely reported in the literature. Improved and faster method of diagnosis employed here to dissect out the pathogenic from the nonpathogenic species would help the clinicians to prescribe the appropriate anti-amoebic drug.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAge FactorsAmebiasisChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEducationEntamoeba histolyticaFecesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleMicroscopyMolecular Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID26633890
PMCPMC4669114
OpenAlexW2193684114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.