Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633879›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Nanobodies: site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation.

Tino Pleiner, Mark Bates, Sergei Trakhanov, Chung-Tien Lee, Jan Erik Schliep, Hema Chug, Marc Böhning, Holger Stark, Henning Urlaub, Dirk Görlich

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Nanobodies targeting hnRNPA2/B1 and tau.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tino PleinerDepartment of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-0315
Mark BatesDepartment of NanoBiophotonics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-5277
Sergei TrakhanovDepartment of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-6153
Chung-Tien LeeBioanalytical Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Jan Erik Schliep3D Electron Cryo-Microscopy Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-5954
Hema ChugDepartment of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9889-7076
Marc BöhningDepartment of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4245-5113
Holger Stark3D Electron Cryo-Microscopy Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Henning UrlaubBioanalytical Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-5233
Dirk GörlichDepartment of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-5210
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobodies are single-domain antibodies of camelid origin. We generated nanobodies against the vertebrate nuclear pore complex (NPC) and used them in STORM imaging to locate individual NPC proteins with <2 nm epitope-label displacement. For this, we introduced cysteines at specific positions in the nanobody sequence and labeled the resulting proteins with fluorophore-maleimides. As nanobodies are normally stabilized by disulfide-bonded cysteines, this appears counterintuitive. Yet, our analysis showed that this caused no folding problems. Compared to traditional NHS ester-labeling of lysines, the cysteine-maleimide strategy resulted in far less background in fluorescence imaging, it better preserved epitope recognition and it is site-specific. We also devised a rapid epitope-mapping strategy, which relies on crosslinking mass spectrometry and the introduced ectopic cysteines. Finally, we used different anti-nucleoporin nanobodies to purify the major NPC building blocks – each in a single step, with native elution and, as demonstrated, in excellent quality for structural analysis by electron microscopy. The presented strategies are applicable to any nanobody and nanobody-target.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingHumansMacromolecular SubstancesNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsOptical ImagingSingle-Domain AntibodiesStaining and LabelingMacromolecular SubstancesNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsSingle-Domain Antibodiesbiochemistrycell biologyE. coliepitope mappinglabel displacementnanobodynative purificationnuclear pore complexsite-specificxenopus

Identifiers

PMID26633879
PMCPMC4755751
OpenAlexW2188343696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.