Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633649›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Recovered from Feedlot Cattle and Associations with Antimicrobial Use.

Katharine M Benedict, Sheryl P Gow, Tim A McAllister, Calvin W Booker, Sherry J Hannon, Sylvia L Checkley, Noelle R Noyes, Paul S Morley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pathogenomic Characterization of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Longitudinal Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance amongAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multidrug Resistance ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine M BenedictDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Sheryl P GowLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Tim A McAllisterLethbridge Research Center, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Calvin W BookerFeedlot Health Management Services, Ltd., Okotoks, Alberta, Canada.
Sherry J HannonFeedlot Health Management Services, Ltd., Okotoks, Alberta, Canada.
Sylvia L CheckleyFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Noelle R NoyesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Paul S MorleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Colorado State University · USAlberta Health Services · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Lethbridge · CA

Funding

Veterinary Pre-Doctoral Research Scholars ProgramT32OD012201 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VANDEWOUDE, SUE · 2013 to 2019
$795k
NIH HHS T32 OD012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and to investigate the associations between exposures to antimicrobial drugs (AMDs) and AMR in fecal non-type specific Escherichia coli (NTSEC) recovered from a large population of feedlot cattle. Two-stage random sampling was used to select individually identified cattle for enrollment, which were sampled at arrival and then a second time later in the feeding period. Advanced regression techniques were used to estimate resistance prevalences, and to investigate associations between AMD exposures in enrolled cattle and penmates and AMR identified in NTSEC recovered from the second sample set. Resistance was most commonly detected to tetracycline, streptomycin, and sulfisoxazole, and was rarely identified for critically important AMDs. All cattle were exposed to AMDs in feed, and 45% were treated parenterally. While resistance prevalence generally increased during the feeding period, most AMD exposures were not significantly associated with AMR outcomes. Exposures of enrolled cattle to tetracycline were associated with increased resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim sulfa, while beta-lactam exposures were associated with decreased likelihood of detecting streptomycin resistance. Pen-level AMD exposure measures were not associated with resistance outcomes. These findings suggest that tetracycline treatment of feedlot cattle can be associated with modest increases in risk for recovery of resistant NTSEC, but the numerous treatments with an advanced macrolide (tulathromycin) were not associated with detectable increases in resistance in NTSEC. All cattle were exposed to in-feed treatments of tetracycline and this could limit the ability to identify the full impact of these exposures, but these exposures varied for enrolled cattle varied, providing an opportunity to evaluate a dose response. While AMD exposures were not associated with detectably increased risks for resistance to critically important AMDs, rare resistance outcomes and infrequent exposure to other important AMDs (e.g., cephalosporins) limited our ability to rigorously investigate questions regarding factors that can influence resistance to these important AMDs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26633649
PMCPMC4669080
OpenAlexW2191214627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.