Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633469›Full record

ReviewViruses2015

Viral Infection at High Magnification: 3D Electron Microscopy Methods to Analyze the Architecture of Infected Cells.

Inés Romero-Brey, Ralf Bartenschlager

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 Biogenesis and Intracellular Transport.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Quantitative Electron Microscopy to Study HCMV Morphogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  20. Three-dimensional deconvolution processing for STEM cryotomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inés Romero-BreyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 345, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. ines_romero-brey@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Ralf BartenschlagerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 345, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. ralf_bartenschlager@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses need to hijack their cellular hosts and reprogram their machineries in order to replicate their genomes and produce new virions. For the direct visualization of the different steps of a viral life cycle (attachment, entry, replication, assembly and egress) electron microscopy (EM) methods are extremely helpful. While conventional EM has given important information about virus-host cell interactions, the development of three-dimensional EM (3D-EM) approaches provides unprecedented insights into how viruses remodel the intracellular architecture of the host cell. During the last years several 3D-EM methods have been developed. Here we will provide a description of the main approaches and examples of innovative applications.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsBacteriaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ElectronMicrotomyPlantsVirusescell membranescryo-EMelectron tomographyfocus ion beam-scanning electron microscopyscanning transmission electron microscopyserial block face-scanning electron microscopyserial sectioningtransmission electron microscopyultrastructurevirus-host interactions

Identifiers

PMID26633469
PMCPMC4690864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.