Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633433›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Indoor Air Contamination from Hazardous Waste Sites: Improving the Evidence Base for Decision-Making.

Jill Johnston, Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Does Hazardous-Waste Testing Follow Technical Guidance, Thus Help Protect Environmental Justice and Health?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Health Misinformation about Toxic-Site Harm: The Case for Independent-Party Testing to Confirm Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  4. Data-Quality Assessment Signals Toxic-Site Safety Threats and Environmental Injustices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jill JohnstonDivision of Environmental Health, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. jillj@usc.edu.
Jacqueline MacDonald GibsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. jackie.macdonald@unc.edu.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES007048 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROB S MCCONNELL · 1996 to 2026
$46.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007048NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES007048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At hazardous waste sites, volatile chemicals can migrate through groundwater and soil into buildings, a process known as vapor intrusion. Due to increasing recognition of vapor intrusion as a potential indoor air pollution source, in 2015 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a new vapor intrusion guidance document. The guidance specifies two conditions for demonstrating that remediation is needed: (1) proof of a vapor intrusion pathway; and (2) evidence that human health risks exceed established thresholds (for example, one excess cancer among 10,000 exposed people). However, the guidance lacks details on methods for demonstrating these conditions. We review current evidence suggesting that monitoring and modeling approaches commonly employed at vapor intrusion sites do not adequately characterize long-term exposure and in many cases may underestimate risks. On the basis of this evidence, we recommend specific approaches to monitoring and modeling to account for these uncertainties. We propose a value of information approach to integrate the lines of evidence at a site and determine if more information is needed before deciding whether the two conditions specified in the vapor intrusion guidance are satisfied. To facilitate data collection and decision-making, we recommend a multi-directional community engagement strategy and consideration of environment justice concerns.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationGroundwaterGuidelines as TopicHazardous Waste SitesHumansSoil PollutantsUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyVolatile Organic CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAir PollutantsSoil PollutantsVolatile Organic CompoundsWater Pollutants, Chemicalcontaminated sitesenvironmental decision-makinghazardous wasteindoor air qualityvapor intrusion

Identifiers

PMID26633433
PMCPMC4690896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.