Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633371›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Characterization of Morphological and Cellular Events Underlying Oral Regeneration in the Sea Anemone, Nematostella vectensis.

Aldine R Amiel, Hereroa T Johnston, Karine Nedoncelle, Jacob F Warner, Solène Ferreira, Eric Röttinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genome of the sea anemoneFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aldine R AmielInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. aldine.amiel@unice.fr.
Hereroa T JohnstonInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. j.hereroa@hotmail.fr.
Karine NedoncelleInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. Karine.Nedoncelle@unice.fr.
Jacob F WarnerInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. warner.jacob@gmail.com.
Solène FerreiraInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. solene.ferreira.ca@gmail.com.
Eric RöttingerInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, Nice 06107 Cedex 02, France. eric.rottinger@unice.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cnidarians, the extant sister group to bilateria, are well known for their impressive regenerative capacity. The sea anemone Nematostella vectensis is a well-established system for the study of development and evolution that is receiving increased attention for its regenerative capacity. Nematostella is able to regrow missing body parts within five to six days after its bisection, yet studies describing the morphological, cellular, and molecular events underlying this process are sparse and very heterogeneous in their experimental approaches. In this study, we lay down the basic framework to study oral regeneration in Nematostella vectensis. Using various imaging and staining techniques we characterize in detail the morphological, cellular, and global molecular events that define specific landmarks of this process. Furthermore, we describe in vivo assays to evaluate wound healing success and the initiation of pharynx reformation. Using our described landmarks for regeneration and in vivo assays, we analyze the effects of perturbing either transcription or cellular proliferation on the regenerative process. Interestingly, neither one of these experimental perturbations has major effects on wound closure, although they slightly delay or partially block it. We further show that while the inhibition of transcription blocks regeneration in a very early step, inhibiting cellular proliferation only affects later events such as pharynx reformation and tentacle elongation.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell ProliferationFluorescenceGene Expression RegulationMicroscopy, ConfocalSea AnemonesTemperatureTranscription, GeneticWound Healingmarine invertebrateNematostella vectensisregenerationsea anemonetissue trackingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID26633371
PMCPMC4691047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.