Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633191›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Qualitative Study of Prescription Contraception Use: The Perspectives of Users, General Practitioners and Pharmacists.

Leigh-Ann Sweeney, Gerard J Molloy, Molly Byrne, Andrew W Murphy, Karen Morgan, Carmel M Hughes, Roger Ingham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Leigh-Ann SweeneySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Gerard J MolloySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Molly ByrneSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Andrew W MurphyDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Karen MorganDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Roger InghamCentre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEPerdana University · MYQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe oral contraceptive pill (OCP) remains the most popular form of prescription contraception in many countries, despite adherence difficulties for many. Uptake of long acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), which are less reliant on user adherence, remains low. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of, and attitudes towards, prescription contraception amongst samples of contraception users, general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists. METHODOLOGY AND

findingsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 18 contraception users, 18 GPs and 9 pharmacists. The study took place in Galway, Republic of Ireland between June and September 2014. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Overall, contraception users were more familiar with the OCP, and all the women interviewed began their prescription contraception journey using this method. All participants identified episodes of poor adherence throughout the reproductive life course. The identified barriers for use of LARCs were lack of information, misconceptions, lack of access and high cost. In contrast, GPs believed that adherence to the OCP was good and stated they were more likely to prescribe the OCP than other methods, as they were most familiar with this option. Barriers to prescribing LARCSs were time, cost to practice, training and deskilling. Pharmacists also believed that adherence to the OCP was generally good and that their role was limited to dispensing medication and providing information when asked. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThere are contrasting perspectives between contraception service providers and contraceptive users. Training for healthcare providers is required to support informed contraceptive choice and adherence. It is necessary to address the practice barriers of cost and lack of time, to promote better communication around adherence issues and prescription contraception options. There is a need for more easily-accessible public health information to promote awareness on all methods of prescription contraception.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelContraceptionFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26633191
PMCPMC4669182
OpenAlexW2184278068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.