Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633144›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Empirical estimation of the normative blood pressure in infants <28 weeks gestation using a massive data approach.

Z A Vesoulis, N M El Ters, M Wallendorf, A M Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Monitoring and evaluation of hypotension in the extremely preterm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Z A VesoulisDivision of Newborn Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, and St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.
N M El TersDivision of Newborn Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, and St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.
M WallendorfDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
A M MathurDivision of Newborn Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, and St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center-Administrative Down Syndrome SupplementU54HD087011 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CONSTANTINO, JOHN N. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP30HD062171 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NEIL, JEFFREY J. · 2010 to 2014
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450-08NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD062171NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the expected systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressures at birth and respective rates of change during the first 72 h of life in infants born at <28 weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) with a favorable short-term outcome, defined as survival to 14 days with grade II or less intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). STUDY

designSystolic, mean and diastolic blood pressures were continuously sampled at 0.5 Hz via umbilical artery catheter from birth through 72 h. The raw data were aligned by postnatal hour and underwent error correction. For each infant, the mean values of systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure were calculated for each postnatal hour. The slope and intercept of best-fit line for each of the three blood pressure parameters was then calculated. Infants that received inotropic medications, died in the first 14 days of life, or had IVH grade III or IV were excluded.

resultUsing 11.9 million valid data points from 35 infants (mean EGA=25.7 ± 1.5 weeks, mean birth weight=865 ± 201 g), we found independent associations of African-American race (P<0.01) and a complete course of antenatal steroids (P<0.01) with higher blood pressures at birth and a slower rate of increase. Acute chorioamnionitis was independently associated (P=0.02) with lower blood pressures at birth and a faster rate of increase. EGA and birth weight were not independently predictive of blood pressure parameters.

conclusionWe found that (i) the estimated mean blood pressure at birth is ~33 mmHg in a cohort of very preterm infants, (ii) blood pressure gradually increases with postnatal age, (iii) systolic blood pressure increases at a faster rate than diastolic blood pressure, (iv) race, antenatal steroid exposure and chorioamnionitis are independent modulators of blood pressure whereas EGA and birth weight are not.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBlack PeopleBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesReference Values

Identifiers

PMID26633144
PMCPMC4808440
OpenAlexW2190426668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.