Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26633037›Full record

Observational studyJAMA oncology2016

Neurotoxic Effects of Anthracycline- vs Nonanthracycline-Based Chemotherapy on Cognition in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Shelli R Kesler, Douglas W Blayney

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Nicotinic treatment of post-chemotherapy subjective cognitive impairment: a pilot study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Seeing through "brain fog": neuroimaging assessment and imaging biomarkers for cancer-related cognitive impairments.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shelli R KeslerDepartment of Neuro-oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Douglas W BlayneyDivision of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

Very-long Term Neurocognitive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors (ProbC2)R01CA172145 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, PALESH, OXANA G · 2012 to 2024
$3.3M
Multimodal MRI Biomarker of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Breast CancerR01NR014195 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, WEFEL, JEFFREY SCOTT · 2012 to 2017
$2.5M
Assessment and Treatment of Cognitive Deficits in Breast CancerDP2OD004445 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R · 2008 to 2008
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA172145NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172145NIH HHS 1DP2OD004445NIH HHS DP2 OD004445NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceChemotherapy exposure is a known risk factor for cancer-related cognitive impairments. Anthracycline-based regimens are commonly used chemotherapies that have been shown to be associated with cognitive impairment and brain changes in clinical studies.

objectiveTo directly compare the effects of anthracycline and nonanthracycline regimens on cognitive status and functional brain connectivity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn this observational study, we retrospectively examined cognitive and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data acquired from 62 primary breast cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 54.7 [8.5] years) who were more than 2 years off-therapy, on average. Twenty of these women received anthracycline-based chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment, 19 received nonanthracycline regimens, and 23 did not receive any chemotherapy. Participants were enrolled at a single academic institution (Stanford University) from 2008 to 2014, and the study analyses were performed at this time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cognitive status was measured using standardized neuropsychological tests, and functional brain connectivity was evaluated using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging with a focus on the brain's default mode network.

resultsThe anthracycline group demonstrated significantly lower verbal memory performance including immediate recall (F = 3.73; P = .03) and delayed recall (F = 11.11; P < .001) as well as lower left precuneus connectivity (F = 7.48; P = .001) compared with the other 2 groups. Patient-reported outcomes related to cognitive dysfunction (F = 7.27; P = .002) and psychological distress (F = 5.64; P = .006) were similarly elevated in both chemotherapy groups compared with the non-chemotherapy-treated controls. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results suggest that anthracyclines may have greater negative effects than nonanthracycline regimens on particular cognitive domains and brain network connections. Both anthracycline and nonanthracycline regimens may have nonspecific effects on other cognitive domains as well as certain patient reported outcomes. Further research is needed to identify potential methods for protecting the brain against the effects of various chemotherapeutic agents.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAnthracyclines

Identifiers

PMID26633037
PMCPMC4838415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.