Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26632844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Functional Metagenomics of the Bronchial Microbiome in COPD.

Laura Millares, Vicente Pérez-Brocal, Rafaela Ferrari, Miguel Gallego, Xavier Pomares, Marian García-Núñez, Concepción Montón, Silvia Capilla, Eduard Monsó, Andrés Moya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The lung microbiome: progress and promise.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Methods in Lung Microbiome Research.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Annals of translational medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura MillaresFundació Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Vicente Pérez-BrocalGenomics and Health Area, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Public Health), Valencia, Spain.
Rafaela FerrariGenomics and Health Area, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Public Health), Valencia, Spain.
Miguel GallegoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Xavier PomaresCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES, Bunyola, Spain.
Marian García-NúñezFundació Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Concepción MontónCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES, Bunyola, Spain.
Silvia CapillaDepartment of Microbiology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Eduard MonsóCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES, Bunyola, Spain.
Andrés MoyaGenomics and Health Area, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Public Health), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently aggravated by exacerbations, and changes in the composition and activity of the microbiome may be implicated in their appearance. The aim of this study was to analyse the composition and the gene content of the microbial community in bronchial secretions of COPD patients in both stability and exacerbation. Taxonomic data were obtained by 16S rRNA gene amplification and pyrosequencing, and metabolic information through shotgun metagenomics, using the Metagenomics RAST server (MG-RAST), and the PICRUSt (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) programme, which predict metagenomes from 16S data. Eight severe COPD patients provided good quality sputum samples, and no significant differences in the relative abundance of any phyla and genera were found between stability and exacerbation. Bacterial biodiversity (Chao1 and Shannon indexes) did not show statistical differences and beta-diversity analysis (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index) showed a similar microbial composition in the two clinical situations. Four functional categories showed statistically significant differences with MG-RAST at KEGG level 2: in exacerbation, Cell growth and Death and Transport and Catabolism decreased in abundance [1.6 (0.2-2.3) vs 3.6 (3.3-6.9), p = 0.012; and 1.8 (0-3.3) vs 3.6 (1.8-5.1), p = 0.025 respectively], while Cancer and Carbohydrate Metabolism increased [0.8 (0-1.5) vs 0 (0-0.5), p = 0.043; and 7 (6.4-9) vs 5.9 (6.3-6.1), p = 0.012 respectively]. In conclusion, the bronchial microbiome as a whole is not significantly modified when exacerbation symptoms appear in severe COPD patients, but its functional metabolic capabilities show significant changes in several pathways.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLungMaleMetagenomeMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26632844
PMCPMC4669145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.