ArticleMedicine2015
A Novel Combination of Calprotectin and CXCL12 for Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Exudative Pleural Effusion.
Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pleural biomarkers in diagnostics of malignant pleural effusion: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Review
- Calprotectin in Lung Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The diagnostic utility of pleural markers for tuberculosis pleural effusion.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions.Turkish thoracic journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleural effusion (PE) remains a significant challenge and public health problem, which needs novel noninvasive biomarkers for the precise diagnosis. The aim of this study was to further determine the clinical efficacy and diagnostic accuracy of a novel combination of calprotectin and CXCL12 for predicting malignancy in patients with exudative PE.Calprotectin and CXCL12 concentrations were measured in 95 individuals of exudative PE, with 39 malignant PE (MPE) and 56 benign PE (BPE). The accuracy of calprotectin and CXCL12 levels for discriminating MPE from BPE or tuberculous PE were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between calprotectin and CXCL12 levels and MPE.Calprotectin and CXCL12 levels of patients with MPE were significantly lower than that of BPE and tuberculous PE (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of calprotectin and CXCL12 was 0.683 and 0.641 in MPE and BPE, and a combination of calprotectin ≤500.19 ng/mL and CXCL12 ≤6.11 ng/mL rendered a sensitivity and specificity of 48.72% and 78.57%, respectively. While in MPE and tuberculous PE, the AUC of calprotectin and CXCL12 was 0.696 and 0.690, and a combination of calprotectin ≤421.73 ng/mL and CXCL12 ≤3.71 ng/mL presented a sensitivity and specificity of 25.64% and 95.45%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that both calprotectin and CXCL12 were independent predictors of MPE.Calprotectin and CXCL12 in pleural fluid are informative diagnostic biomarkers for predicting patients with MPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.