ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2015
CRISPR/Cas9 and Germline Modification: New Difficulties in Obtaining Informed Consent.
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023Article
- Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.Journal of responsible innovation · 2021Article
- Human germline editing in the era of CRISPR-Cas: risk and uncertainty, inter-generational responsibility, therapeutic legitimacy.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing.Journal of medical ethics · 2020Article
- Responsible Translational Pathways for Germline Gene Editing?Current stem cell reports · 2020Review
- Ethical issues related to research on genome editing in human embryos.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Trust in Science: CRISPR-Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26632359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.