Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26631983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

The isolation and characterization of CTC subsets related to breast cancer dormancy.

Monika Vishnoi, Sirisha Peddibhotla, Wei Yin, Antonio T Scamardo, Goldy C George, David S Hong, Dario Marchetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Workflow to Enrich and Isolate Patient-Matched EpCAMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monika VishnoiBiomarker Research Program Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.
Sirisha PeddibhotlaDepartment of Pathology &Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Wei YinBiomarker Research Program Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.
Antonio T ScamardoDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Goldy C GeorgeDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
David S HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Dario MarchettiBiomarker Research Program Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Heparanase Mechanisms in Brain-metastatic Breast CancerR01CA160335 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MARCHETTI, DARIO · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01 CA160335NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncovering CTCs phenotypes offer the promise to dissect their heterogeneity related to metastatic competence. CTC survival rates are highly variable and this can lead to many questions as yet unexplored properties of CTCs responsible for invasion and metastasis vs dormancy. We isolated CTC subsets from peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with or without breast cancer brain metastasis. CTC subsets were selected for EpCAM negativity but positivity for CD44(+)/CD24(-) stem cell signature; along with combinatorial expression of uPAR and int β1, two markers directly implicated in breast cancer dormancy mechanisms. CTC subsets were cultured in vitro generating 3D CTC tumorspheres which were interrogated for biomarker profiling and biological characteristics. We identified proliferative and invasive properties of 3D CTC tumorspheres distinctive upon uPAR/int β1 combinatorial expression. The molecular characterization of uPAR/int β1 CTC subsets may enhance abilities to prospectively identify patients who may be at high risk of developing BCBM.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell AdhesionEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLeukocyte Common AntigensMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorSingle-Cell AnalysisSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedBiomarkers, TumorEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeLeukocyte Common AntigensPTPRC protein, humanReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID26631983
PMCPMC4668355
OpenAlexW2189531780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.