ArticleScientific reports2015
Cross-modal and modality-specific expectancy effects between pain and disgust.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive mechanisms of disgust in the development and maintenance of psychopathology: A qualitative review and synthesis.Clinical psychology review · 2019Pooled it
- How Instructions, Learning, and Expectations Shape Pain and Neurobiological Responses.Annual review of neuroscience · 2023Review
- Pharmacological fMRI provides evidence for opioidergic modulation of discrimination of facial pain expressions.Psychophysiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Does inappropriate behavior hurt or stink? The interplay between neural representations of somatic experiences and moral decisions.Science advances · 2020Article
- Distinguishing pain from nociception, salience, and arousal: How autonomic nervous system activity can improve neuroimaging tests of specificity.NeuroImage · 2020Review
- The COVID-19 may help enlightening how emotional food is.NPJ science of food · 2020Article
- Different brain networks mediate the effects of social and conditioned expectations on pain.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Sensory-specific predictive models in the human anterior insula.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Anxiety-dependent modulation of motor responses to pain expectancy.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018Article
- Review
- Hypnotic analgesia reduces brain responses to pain seen in others.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Fear Spreading Across Senses: Visual Emotional Events Alter Cortical Responses to Touch, Audition, and Vision.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017Article
- Cross-modal representations of first-hand and vicarious pain, disgust and fairness in insular and cingulate cortex.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain sensitivity increases when a noxious stimulus is preceded by cues predicting higher intensity. However, it is unclear whether the modulation of nociception by expectancy is sensory-specific ("modality based") or reflects the aversive-affective consequence of the upcoming event ("unpleasantness"), potentially common with other negative events. Here we compared expectancy effects for pain and disgust by using different, but equally unpleasant, nociceptive (thermal) and olfactory stimulations. Indeed both pain and disgust are aversive, associated with threat to the organism, and processed in partly overlapping brain networks. Participants saw cues predicting the unpleasantness (high/low) and the modality (pain/disgust) of upcoming thermal or olfactory stimulations, and rated the associated unpleasantness after stimuli delivery. Results showed that identical thermal stimuli were perceived as more unpleasant when preceded by cues threatening about high (as opposed to low) pain. A similar expectancy effect was found for olfactory disgust. Critically, cross-modal expectancy effects were observed on inconsistent trials when thermal stimuli were preceded by high-disgust cues or olfactory stimuli preceded by high-pain cues. However, these effects were stronger in consistent than inconsistent conditions. Taken together, our results suggest that expectation of an unpleasant event elicits representations of both its modality-specific properties and its aversive consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.