Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26631468›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Excitatory Postrhinal Projections to Principal Cells in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex.

Noriko Koganezawa, Ragnhild Gisetstad, Ellen Husby, Thanh P Doan, Menno P Witter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Anterior Thalamus Preferentially Drives Allocentric But Not Egocentric Orientation Tuning in Postrhinal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A sense of space in postrhinal cortex.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differential Contribution of CaFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noriko KoganezawaKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Neural Computation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Ragnhild GisetstadKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Neural Computation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Ellen HusbyKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Neural Computation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Thanh P DoanKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Neural Computation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Menno P WitterKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Neural Computation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway menno.witter@ntnu.no.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postrhinal cortex (POR) provides substantial input to the entorhinal cortex, mainly targeting superficial layers of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC). Major inputs to POR originate in the visual and parietal cortex, thus providing neurons in MEC with a subset of cortical information relevant to their spatial firing properties. The POR takes a position that is comparable with that of the perirhinal cortex (PER) with regard to the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC). Neurons in LEC and MEC show different functional properties likely reflecting differences in their respective inputs. Projections from PER to LEC exert a main inhibitory influence, which may relate to the sparse object-selective firing in LEC. In view of the continuous, spatially modulated firing properties of principal neurons in MEC, we tested in rats the hypothesis that projections from POR to MEC are functionally different from the PER-to-LEC counterpart in providing an excitatory drive to MEC. Our combined confocal and quantitative electron-microscopic observations indicated that POR projections target mainly principal cells in MEC, including neurons that project to the hippocampus. The ultrastructure of the majority of the synapses indicated that they are excitatory. Voltage-sensitive dye imaging in sagittal slices confirmed this morphologically derived conclusion, showing that the MEC network always responded with an overall depolarization, indicative for net excitatory transmission. In vitro single-cell recordings from principal cells showed only excitatory responses upon POR stimulation. These results show that POR provides an excitatory projection to MEC, differing fundamentally from the inhibitory projection of PER to LEC.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiotinChi-Square DistributionDextransEntorhinal CortexExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsHippocampusIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, ElectronNeural PathwaysNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsBiotinbiotinylated dextran amineDextransexcitationlateral entorhinal cortexmemoryparahippocampal regionperirhinal cortex

Identifiers

PMID26631468
PMCPMC6605449
OpenAlexW2442437634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.