ArticleBMC family practice2015
Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison.
Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse working conditions in Romanian out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC): an interview study.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Study on the evaluation and influencing factors of contracted residents on the coordination of primary medical institutions.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Task shifting from general practitioners to practice assistants and nurses in primary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- Quality indicator framework for primary care of patients with dementia.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Task shifting from general practitioners to practice assistants and nurses in primary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.Primary health care research & development · 2021Article
- Article
- The association between the workload of general practitioners and patient experiences with care: results of a cross-sectional study in 33 countries.Human resources for health · 2020Article
- Primary care quality in Vietnam: Perceptions and opinions of primary care physicians in commune health centers - a mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Are people's health care needs better met when primary care is strong? A synthesis of the results of the QUALICOPC study in 34 countries.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- The health service capacity of primary health care in West China: different perspectives of physicians and their patients.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- [An online dynamic knowledge base in multiple languages on general medicine and primary care].The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- The PUFFinCA scale: development of an instrument for evaluating the primary care functions of family physicians in childhood asthma.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Safety culture in the primary health care settings based on workers with a leadership role: the psychometric properties of the Slovenian-language version of the safety attitudes questionnaire - short form.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- GP Practices as a One-Stop Shop: How Do Patients Perceive the Quality of Care? A Cross-Sectional Study in Thirty-Four Countries.Health services research · 2018Article
- Association between the General Practitioner Workforce Crisis and Premature Mortality in Hungary: Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Health Insurance Data from 2006 to 2014.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Anticholinergic Burden and Most Common Anticholinergic-acting Medicines in Older General Practice Patients.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2018Article
- Assessing the representativeness of physician and patient respondents to a primary care survey using administrative data.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: the perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Patient Safety Culture in Slovenian out-of-hours Primary Care Clinics.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2017Article
- Implementing Quality Indicators for Diabetes and Hypertension in Family Medicine in Slovenia.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of our study was to describe variability in process quality in family medicine among 31 European countries plus Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The quality of family medicine was measured in terms of continuity, coordination, community orientation, and comprehensiveness of care.
methodsThe QUALICOPC study (Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe) was carried out among family physicians in 31 European countries (the EU 27 except for France, plus Macedonia, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey) and three non-European countries (Australia, Canada, and New Zealand). We used random sampling when national registers of practitioners were available. Regional registers or lists of facilities were used for some countries. A standardized questionnaire was distributed to the physicians, resulting in a sample of 6734 participants. Data collection took place between October 2011 and December 2013. Based on completed questionnaires, a three-dimensional framework was established to measure continuity, coordination, community orientation, and comprehensiveness of care. Multilevel linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the variation of quality attributable to the family physician level and the country level.
resultsNone of the 34 countries in this study consistently scored the best or worst in all categories. Continuity of care was perceived by family physicians as the most important dimension of quality. Some components of comprehensiveness of care, including medical technical procedures, preventive care and health care promotion, varied substantially between countries. Coordination of care was identified as the weakest part of quality. We found that physician-level characteristics contributed to the majority of variation.
conclusionsA comparison of process quality indicators in family medicine revealed similarities and differences within and between countries. The researchers found that the major proportion of variation can be explained by physicians' characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.