Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26631125›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2015

The Saccharomyces Genome Database: Gene Product Annotation of Function, Process, and Component.

J Michael Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Michael CherryDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5120.

Funding

GENOMIC DATABASE FOR THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCESP41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 1995 to 2010
$27.1M
Genomic Resource for the Yeast SaccharomycesU41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 2011 to 2020
$26.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG001315NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG001315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ontology is a highly structured form of controlled vocabulary. Each entry in the ontology is commonly called a term. These terms are used when talking about an annotation. However, each term has a definition that, like the definition of a word found within a dictionary, provides the complete usage and detailed explanation of the term. It is critical to consult a term's definition because the distinction between terms can be subtle. The use of ontologies in biology started as a way of unifying communication between scientific communities and to provide a standard dictionary for different topics, including molecular functions, biological processes, mutant phenotypes, chemical properties and structures. The creation of ontology terms and their definitions often requires debate to reach agreement but the result has been a unified descriptive language used to communicate knowledge. In addition to terms and definitions, ontologies require a relationship used to define the type of connection between terms. In an ontology, a term can have more than one parent term, the term above it in an ontology, as well as more than one child, the term below it in the ontology. Many ontologies are used to construct annotations in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD), as in all modern biological databases; however, Gene Ontology (GO), a descriptive system used to categorize gene function, is the most extensively used ontology in SGD annotations. Examples included in this protocol illustrate the structure and features of this ontology.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, FungalAccess to InformationComputational BiologyInternetSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID26631125
PMCPMC5673600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.