ReviewTrends in hearing2015
Auditory Model-Based Sound Direction Estimation With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Review in Trends in hearing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localization performance of cochlear implant users with a real-time bilaterally-synchronized sound coding strategy that provides explicit interaural timing cues with mixed rates of stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- [Evaluation of hearing and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in children with Waardenburg syndrome].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022Article
- The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Article
- Physiological models of the lateral superior olive.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences Conveyed in the Stimulus Envelope: Estimating Inputs of Binaural Neurons Through the Temporal Analysis of Spike Trains.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016Article
- Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.Trends in hearing · 2015Article
- Advancing Binaural Cochlear Implant Technology.Trends in hearing · 2015Review
- Article
- Sound Localization in Real-Time Vocoded Cochlear-Implant Simulations With Normal-Hearing Listeners.Trends in hearingArticle
- Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Comparison of Spectral Peak-Picking and Interleaved Stimulation Strategies.Trends in hearingArticle
- Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.Trends in hearingArticle
- Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) show above-chance performance in localizing the source of a sound in the azimuthal (horizontal) plane; although localization errors are far worse than for normal-hearing listeners, they are considerably better than for CI listeners with only one implant. In most previous studies, subjects had access to interaural level differences and to interaural time differences conveyed in the temporal envelope. Here, we present a binaural model that predicts the azimuthal direction of sound arrival from a two-channel input signal as it is received at the left and right CI processor. The model includes a replication of a clinical speech-coding strategy, a model of the electrode-nerve interface and binaural brainstem neurons, and three different prediction stages that are trained to map the neural response rate to an azimuthal angle. The model is trained and tested with various noise and speech stimuli created by means of virtual acoustics. Localization error patterns of the model match experimental data and are explicable largely in terms of the nonmonotonic relationship between interaural level difference and azimuthal angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.