ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2016
Autoantibodies and their Judicious Use in Pediatric Rheumatology Practice.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Art of Interpreting Antinuclear Antibodies (ANAs) in Everyday Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of ideal serum dilution for screening of antinuclear antibodies by an indirect immunofluorescence method in diagnosis of autoimmune disorders.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022Article
- Reliability and reproducibility of antinuclear antibody testing in pediatric rheumatology practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Health: Autoimmunity Is Not a Synonym of Autoimmune Disease.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Editorial: Pediatric Rheumatology has Come of Age in India.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoantibody testing forms an important part of diagnostic workup of patients in Pediatric rheumatology practice. However it is important to understand that the mere presence of autoantibodies does not necessarily mean the presence of an underlying autoimmune disease. Autoantibodies may be present decades before the development of clinical manifestations of an autoimmune disease and may be viewed as harbingers of Autoimmune disease. On the other hand, low-affinity autoantibodies may be present in normal healthy individuals; these natural autoantibodies serve an important function in immune regulation and tolerance. Autoantibody testing in pediatric practice mainly includes testing for anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies. Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP do not have much significance in the diagnostic schema in pediatric rheumatology, except perhaps for classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and prognostication in late-onset polyarticular JIA. The positive predictive value (PPV) of any laboratory test depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population being tested. Hence, test ordering practices greatly impact the performance characteristics and positive predictive value of any laboratory test. A restricted test ordering only in patients with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of autoimmune disease would thus greatly increase the PPV of tests such as antinuclear antibody used for diagnosing autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.