Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26631000›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase connectivity and continuity of care: protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Jennifer L Ridgeway, Annie LeBlanc, Megan Branda, Roger W Harms, Megan A Morris, Kate Nesbitt, Bobbie S Gostout, Lenae M Barkey, Susan M Sobolewski, Ellen Brodrick and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02082275 (Implementation and Evaluation of the OB Nest Project at the Point of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02082275 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation and Evaluation of the OB Nest Project at the Point of Care: Redefining Continuity of Care for Expectant Mothers.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2014 to 2015Enrolled300ConditionsPregnancyArmsOB Nest
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care.Maternal and child health journal · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jennifer L RidgewayRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Ridgeway.Jennifer@mayo.edu.
Annie LeBlancRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. LeBlanc.Annie@mayo.edu.
Megan BrandaDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Branda.Megan@mayo.edu.
Roger W HarmsObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. rharms@mayo.edu.
Megan A MorrisRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Morris.Megan@mayo.edu.
Kate NesbittOffice of Risk Management, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Nesbitt.Katharine@mayo.edu.
Bobbie S GostoutObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Gostout.Bobbie@mayo.edu.
Lenae M BarkeyPractice Administration, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Barkey.Lenae@mayo.edu.
Susan M SobolewskiObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Sobolewski.Susan@mayo.edu.
Ellen BrodrickObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Brodrick.Ellen@mayo.edu.
Jonathan InselmanDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Inselman.Jonathan@mayo.edu.
Anne BaronObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Baron.Anne@mayo.edu.
Angela SivlyObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Sivly.Angela@mayo.edu.
Misty BakerObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Baker.Misty@mayo.edu.
Dawn FinnieRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Finnie.Dawn@mayo.edu.
Rajeev ChaudhryPrimary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Chaudhry.Rajeev@mayo.edu.
Abimbola O FamuyideObstetrics Division, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Famuyide.Abimbola@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost low-risk pregnant women receive the standard model of prenatal care with frequent office visits. Research suggests that a reduced schedule of visits among low-risk women could be implemented without increasing adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, but patient satisfaction with these models varies. We aim to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of a new prenatal care model (OB Nest) that enhances a reduced visit model by adding virtual connections that improve continuity of care and patient-directed access to care. METHODS AND

designThis mixed-methods study uses a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design in a single center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Embedding process evaluation in an experimental design like an RCT allows researchers to answer both "Did it work?" and "How or why did it work (or not work)?" when studying complex interventions, as well as providing knowledge for translation into practice after the study. The RE-AIM framework was used to ensure attention to evaluating program components in terms of sustainable adoption and implementation. Low-risk patients recruited from the Obstetrics Division at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) will be randomized to OB Nest or usual care. OB Nest patients will be assigned to a dedicated nursing team, scheduled for 8 pre-planned office visits with a physician or midwife and 6 telephone or online nurse visits (compared to 12 pre-planned physician or midwife office visits in the usual care group), and provided fetal heart rate and blood pressure home monitoring equipment and information on joining an online care community. Quantitative methods will include patient surveys and medical record abstraction. The primary quantitative outcome is patient-reported satisfaction. Other outcomes include fidelity to items on the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists standards of care list, health care utilization (e.g. numbers of antenatal office visits), and maternal and fetal outcomes (e.g. gestational age at delivery), as well as validated patient-reported measures of pregnancy-related stress and perceived quality of care. Quantitative analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Qualitative methods will include interviews and focus groups with providers, staff, and patients, and will explore satisfaction, intervention adoption, and implementation feasibility. We will use methods of qualitative thematic analysis at three stages. Mixed methods analysis will involve the use of qualitative data to lend insight to quantitative findings. DISCUSSION: This study will make important contributions to the literature on reduced visit models by evaluating a novel prenatal care model with components to increase patient connectedness (even with fewer pre-scheduled office visits), as demonstrated on a range of patient-important outcomes. The use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach, as well as attention to patient and provider perspectives on program components and implementation, may uncover important information that can inform long-term feasibility and potentially speed future translation.

trial registrationTrial registration identifier: NCT02082275 Submitted: March 6, 2014.

Indexed as

AdultClinical ProtocolsContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansOffice VisitsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionPregnancyPrenatal CareProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26631000
PMCPMC4668747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.