Trial reportEuropean radiology2016
Lowering iodinated contrast concentration in infrainguinal endovascular interventions: a three-armed randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06835127 (Feasibility Study of the Use of Ultra-low Dose Iodinated Contrast Agent for Endovascular Procedures in Patients With Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia and Renal Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility Study of the Use of Ultra-low Dose Iodinated Contrast Agent for Endovascular Procedures in Patients With Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia and Renal Impairment
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility pilot study of the use of ultra-low dose iodinated contrast agent for endovascular procedures in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and renal impairment: the ULTRA-LOW study.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Peripheral Arterial Interventions with Reduced Contrast Use: The Save Contrast Study.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Utilization of Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC) at a District General Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Three cases of fusion imaging in endovascular treatment of occlusive peripheral artery disease.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2019Article
- Article
- Predictors and Outcomes of Postcontrast Acute Kidney Injury after Endovascular Renal Artery Intervention.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the influence of lowering iodinated contrast concentration on confidence of interventional radiologists in diagnosing and treating lesions during endovascular interventions in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
methodsA randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was performed in 60 patients. Intervention was performed with contrast concentrations (in mg of iodine per mL, mgI/mL) of 300 (standard), 240, or 140 mgI/mL. Primary outcome was confidence (score 0-100 %) of radiologists in diagnosing and treating arterial lesions. Secondary outcomes were procedural iodine load and image quality (i.e. non-diagnostic, limited, diagnostic, exemplary).
resultsMedian confidence scores in diagnosing lesions were 100 % (range 81-100 %) for the 300 group (n = 21), 100 % (range 82-100 %) for the 240 group (n = 19), and 100 % (range 91-100 %) for the 140 group (n = 20) (both p = 1.00 compared to the 300 group). Median scores for treating lesions in the 240 and 140 groups, 100 % (range 79-100 %, p = 0.40), and 100 % (range 63-100 %, p = 0.25), respectively, were not lower compared to the 300 group (median 100 %, range 78-100 %). Procedural iodine load was lower in the 240 (24.3 ± 7.6 g, p = 0.022) and 140 groups (17.8 ± 5.6 g, p < 0.001) compared to the 300 group (29.7 ± 6.3 g). Image quality was diagnostic for all groups.
conclusionUsing iodine contrast of 140 mgI/mL for diagnosis and interventions in PAD patients significantly reduces administered iodine load without compromising image quality. Future use of lower iodine dose is recommended. KEY POINTS: • Lower iodinated contrast concentration during endovascular intervention does not decrease radiologist's confidence. • Image quality of standardized angiographies remains diagnostic using 140 mgI/mL iodinated contrast concentration. • Iodine load during intervention can be decreased by >40 % when using 140 mgI/mL. • Implementing the use of a lower iodinated contrast concentration will reduce the costs of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.