Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26630677›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Tool for Multiple Targeted Genome Deletions that Is Precise, Scar-Free, and Suitable for Automation.

Wayne Aubrey, Michael C Riley, Michael Young, Ross D King, Stephen G Oliver, Amanda Clare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wayne AubreyDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, United Kingdom.
Michael C RileyInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DD, United Kingdom.
Michael YoungInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DD, United Kingdom.
Ross D KingManchester Institute of Biotechnology and School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Stephen G OliverCambridge Systems Biology Centre and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.
Amanda ClareDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, United Kingdom.
Aberystwyth University · GBInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F008228/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G024782/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many advances in synthetic biology require the removal of a large number of genomic elements from a genome. Most existing deletion methods leave behind markers, and as there are a limited number of markers, such methods can only be applied a fixed number of times. Deletion methods that recycle markers generally are either imprecise (remove untargeted sequences), or leave scar sequences which can cause genome instability and rearrangements. No existing marker recycling method is automation-friendly. We have developed a novel openly available deletion tool that consists of: 1) a method for deleting genomic elements that can be repeatedly used without limit, is precise, scar-free, and suitable for automation; and 2) software to design the method's primers. Our tool is sequence agnostic and could be used to delete large numbers of coding sequences, promoter regions, transcription factor binding sites, terminators, etc in a single genome. We have validated our tool on the deletion of non-essential open reading frames (ORFs) from S. cerevisiae. The tool is applicable to arbitrary genomes, and we provide primer sequences for the deletion of: 90% of the ORFs from the S. cerevisiae genome, 88% of the ORFs from S. pombe genome, and 85% of the ORFs from the L. lactis genome.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalSequence DeletionAutomationCicatrixComputational BiologyGenomicsOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID26630677
PMCPMC4668057
OpenAlexW2195423926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.