Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26630648›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Mycobacterium ulcerans in the Elderly: More Severe Disease and Suboptimal Outcomes.

Daniel P O'Brien, N Deborah Friedman, Raquel Cowan, James Pollard, Anthony McDonald, Peter Callan, Andrew Hughes, Eugene Athan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. AtypicalJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Systematic review: Global host range, case fatality and detection rates ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel P O'BrienDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
N Deborah FriedmanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Raquel CowanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
James PollardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony McDonaldDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Peter CallanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew HughesDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Eugene AthanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical presentation of M. ulcerans disease and the safety and effectiveness of treatment may differ in elderly compared with younger populations related to relative immune defficiencies, co-morbidities and drug interactions. However, elderly populations with M. ulcerans disease have not been comprehensively studied. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA retrospective analysis was performed on an observational cohort of all confirmed M. ulcerans cases managed at Barwon Health from 1/1/1998-31/12/2014. The cohort included 327 patients; 131(40.0%) ≥65 years and 196(60.0%) <65 years of age. Patients ≥65 years had a shorter median duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis (p<0.01), a higher proportion with diabetes (p<0.001) and immune suppression (p<0.001), and were more likely to have lesions that were multiple (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.78-12.31, p<0.001) and WHO category 3 (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.98-10.59, p<0.001). Antibiotic complications occurred in 69(24.3%) treatment episodes at an increased incidence in those aged ≥65 years (OR 5.29, 95% CI 2.81-9.98, p<0.001). There were 4(1.2%) deaths, with significantly more in the age-group ≥65 years (4 compared with 0 deaths, p = 0.01). The overall treatment success rate was 92.2%. For the age-group ≥65 years there was a reduced rate of treatment success overall (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.80, p = <0.01) and when surgery was used alone (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.76, p<0.01). Patients ≥65 years were more likely to have a paradoxical reaction (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.17-3.62, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Elderly patients comprise a significant proportion of M. ulcerans disease patients in Australian populations and present with more severe and advanced disease forms. Currently recommended treatments are associated with increased toxicity and reduced effectiveness in elderly populations. Increased efforts are required to diagnose M. ulcerans earlier in elderly populations, and research is urgently required to develop more effective and less toxic treatments for this age-group.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaBuruli UlcerDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium ulceransRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26630648
PMCPMC4667883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.