Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26630607›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2016

Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent.

Robert J Smith, David Grande, Raina M Merchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Delivering Digital Health Solutions that Patients Need: A Call to Action.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert J SmithR.J. Smith is a fourth-year medical student and research fellow, Penn Medicine Social Media and Health Innovation Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. D. Grande is assistant professor of medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, and senior fellow and director of policy, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. R.M. Merchant is assistant professor of emergency medicine and director, Penn Medicine Social Media and Health Innovation Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, and senior fellow, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David Grande
Raina M Merchant

Funding

Twitter and Cardiovascular HealthR01HL122457 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERCHANT, RAINA · 2015 to 2017
$2.1M
Understanding the drivers of hospital performance for in-hospital cardiac arrestK23HL109083 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERCHANT, RAINA · 2011 to 2015
$692k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL109083NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122457PHS HHS K23 10714038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over 1.7 billion individuals engaged in social media, patients and consumers share more about their lives than ever before through wearable devices, smartphone applications, and social media outlets. This cornucopia of data offers significant opportunity for health researchers and clinicians to track and explore how digital presence contributes to patients' health outcomes and use of health care resources. While patients readily share their information with online communities, it is imperative that they maintain a sense of autonomy over who has access to such data. Recent data breaches of major insurance companies and retailers illustrate the challenges and vulnerabilities related to information safety and privacy. Many Web sites and mobile apps require users to agree to data policies, but how those data are mined, protected, used, and externally shared is frequently nontransparent, resulting in a climate of fear and distrust around all forums of digital information sharing. Although such skepticism is perhaps justified, it should not deter health researchers from attempting to collect and analyze these novel data for the purpose of designing unique health interventions. By clarifying intent around digital data acquisition, simplifying consent procedures, and affirming a commitment to privacy, the authors contend that health researchers can partner with patients to transform the boundaries of scientific inquiry.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityDisclosureInformation DisseminationInformed ConsentAccess to InformationHumansMobile ApplicationsOrganizational CulturePersonal AutonomyResearch PersonnelSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID26630607
PMCPMC4811677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.