Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26630487›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Contrasting the Chromosomal Organization of Repetitive DNAs in Two Gryllidae Crickets with Highly Divergent Karyotypes.

Octavio M Palacios-Gimenez, Carlos Roberto Carvalho, Fernanda Aparecida Ferrari Soares, Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid chromosomal evolution in the bush-cricketComparative cytogenetics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Satellite DNAs are conserved and differentially transcribed among Gryllus cricket species.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Octavio M Palacios-GimenezUNESP-Univ. Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências/IB, Departamento de Biologia, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto CarvalhoUFV-Univ. Federal de Viçosa, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Fernanda Aparecida Ferrari SoaresUFV-Univ. Federal de Viçosa, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Diogo C Cabral-de-MelloUNESP-Univ. Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências/IB, Departamento de Biologia, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large percentage of eukaryotic genomes consist of repetitive DNA that plays an important role in the organization, size and evolution. In the case of crickets, chromosomal variability has been found using classical cytogenetics, but almost no information concerning the organization of their repetitive DNAs is available. To better understand the chromosomal organization and diversification of repetitive DNAs in crickets, we studied the chromosomes of two Gryllidae species with highly divergent karyotypes, i.e., 2n(♂) = 29,X0 (Gryllus assimilis) and 2n = 9, neo-X1X2Y (Eneoptera surinamensis). The analyses were performed using classical cytogenetic techniques, repetitive DNA mapping and genome-size estimation. Conserved characteristics were observed, such as the occurrence of a small number of clusters of rDNAs and U snDNAs, in contrast to the multiple clusters/dispersal of the H3 histone genes. The positions of U2 snDNA and 18S rDNA are also conserved, being intermingled within the largest autosome. The distribution and base-pair composition of the heterochromatin and repetitive DNA pools of these organisms differed, suggesting reorganization. Although the microsatellite arrays had a similar distribution pattern, being dispersed along entire chromosomes, as has been observed in some grasshopper species, a band-like pattern was also observed in the E. surinamensis chromosomes, putatively due to their amplification and clustering. In addition to these differences, the genome of E. surinamensis is approximately 2.5 times larger than that of G. assimilis, which we hypothesize is due to the amplification of repetitive DNAs. Finally, we discuss the possible involvement of repetitive DNAs in the differentiation of the neo-sex chromosomes of E. surinamensis, as has been reported in other eukaryotic groups. This study provided an opportunity to explore the evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNAs in two non-model species and will contribute to the understanding of chromosomal evolution in a group about which little chromosomal and genomic information is known.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, InsectDNAEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetic VariationGenome, InsectGryllidaeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeKaryotypingMaleMultigene FamilyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSex ChromosomesDNA

Identifiers

PMID26630487
PMCPMC4667936
OpenAlexW2192143837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.