Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26630392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

"Rate My Therapist": Automated Detection of Empathy in Drug and Alcohol Counseling via Speech and Language Processing.

Bo Xiao, Zac E Imel, Panayiotis G Georgiou, David C Atkins, Shrikanth S Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Applying Artificial Intelligence to Expand the Measurement Tool Kit in Clinical-Psychological Science: Moving Beyond Self-Reports.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Client Distress From Session Recordings.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  17. A scoping review of empathy recognition in text using natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bo XiaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Zac E ImelDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States of America.
Panayiotis G GeorgiouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
Shrikanth S NarayananDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.

Funding

Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Development and feasibility of computer based fidelity monitoring for MIR34DA034860 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI IMEL, ZACHARY E. · 2013 to 2015
$739k
Using Technology to Scale Up the Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingK02AA023814 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES · 2015 to 2019
$690k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA023814NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673NIAAA NIH HHS R01/AA018673NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034860NIDA NIH HHS R34/DA034860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technology for evaluating patient-provider interactions in psychotherapy-observational coding-has not changed in 70 years. It is labor-intensive, error prone, and expensive, limiting its use in evaluating psychotherapy in the real world. Engineering solutions from speech and language processing provide new methods for the automatic evaluation of provider ratings from session recordings. The primary data are 200 Motivational Interviewing (MI) sessions from a study on MI training methods with observer ratings of counselor empathy. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) was used to transcribe sessions, and the resulting words were used in a text-based predictive model of empathy. Two supporting datasets trained the speech processing tasks including ASR (1200 transcripts from heterogeneous psychotherapy sessions and 153 transcripts and session recordings from 5 MI clinical trials). The accuracy of computationally-derived empathy ratings were evaluated against human ratings for each provider. Computationally-derived empathy scores and classifications (high vs. low) were highly accurate against human-based codes and classifications, with a correlation of 0.65 and F-score (a weighted average of sensitivity and specificity) of 0.86, respectively. Empathy prediction using human transcription as input (as opposed to ASR) resulted in a slight increase in prediction accuracies, suggesting that the fully automatic system with ASR is relatively robust. Using speech and language processing methods, it is possible to generate accurate predictions of provider performance in psychotherapy from audio recordings alone. This technology can support large-scale evaluation of psychotherapy for dissemination and process studies.

Indexed as

CounselingEmpathyLanguageProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapySpeechAlcoholismAutomationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational Interviewing

Identifiers

PMID26630392
PMCPMC4668058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.