ArticlePloS one2015
Evaluating Models of Cellulose Degradation by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Dietary Rumen-Protected Choline and Nicotinic Acid Supplementation on Growth Outcomes and Meat Tenderness, Rumen Microbial Composition, and Serum Metabolomics of Late-Fattening Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the role of the gayal rumen and hindgut microbiome in high-efficiency lignocellulose degradation.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Niche specialization and cross-feeding interactions shaping gut microbial fiber degradation in a model omnivore.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of the interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, Selenomonas ruminantium PC18 and a live yeast strain used as a ruminant feed additive.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Studies on the concerted interaction of microbes in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants on lignocellulose and its degradation mechanism.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Membrane Vesicles Can Contribute to Cellulose Degradation by Teredinibacter turnerae, a Cultivable Intracellular Endosymbiont of Shipworms.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Membrane vesicles can contribute to cellulose degradation bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Nicotinic acid changes rumen fermentation and apparent nutrient digestibility by regulating rumen microbiota in Xiangzhong black cattle.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Indole-3-acetic acid enhances ruminal microbiota for aflatoxin B1 removalFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Targeted rRNA depletion enables efficient mRNA sequencing in diverse bacterial species and complex co-cultures.mSystems · 2023Article
- Revisiting Microbial Diversity in Hypersaline Microbial Mats from Guerrero Negro for a Better Understanding of Methanogenic Archaeal Communities.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Degradation of Cellulose and Hemicellulose by Ruminal Microorganisms.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- The microbiome of the buffalo digestive tract.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Gut microbiome of the largest living rodent harbors unprecedented enzymatic systems to degrade plant polysaccharides.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Deciphering the unique cellulose degradation mechanism of the ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Islands in the stream: from individual to communal fiber degradation in the rumen ecosystem.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Extracellular vesicles carry cellulases in the industrial fungusBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- The Phylogenomic Diversity of Herbivore-AssociatedmSphere · 2018Article
- "Candidatus Paraporphyromonas polyenzymogenes" encodes multi-modular cellulases linked to the type IX secretion system.Microbiome · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 is an anaerobic non-cellulosome utilizing cellulolytic bacterium originally isolated from the cow rumen microbial community. Efforts to elucidate its cellulolytic machinery have resulted in the proposal of numerous models which involve cell-surface attachment via a combination of cellulose-binding fibro-slime proteins and pili, the production of cellulolytic vesicles, and the entry of cellulose fibers into the periplasmic space. Here, we used a combination of RNA-sequencing, proteomics, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to further clarify the cellulolytic mechanism of F. succinogenes. Our RNA-sequence analysis shows that genes encoding type II and III secretion systems, fibro-slime proteins, and pili are differentially expressed on cellulose, relative to glucose. A subcellular fractionation of cells grown on cellulose revealed that carbohydrate active enzymes associated with cellulose deconstruction and fibro-slime proteins were greater in the extracellular medium, as compared to the periplasm and outer membrane fractions. TEMs of samples harvested at mid-exponential and stationary phases of growth on cellulose and glucose showed the presence of grooves in the cellulose between the bacterial cells and substrate, suggesting enzymes work extracellularly for cellulose degradation. Membrane vesicles were only observed in stationary phase cultures grown on cellulose. These results provide evidence that F. succinogenes attaches to cellulose fibers using fibro-slime and pili, produces cellulases, such as endoglucanases, that are secreted extracellularly using type II and III secretion systems, and degrades the cellulose into cellodextrins that are then imported back into the periplasm for further digestion by β-glucanases and other cellulases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.