Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26629814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Evaluating Models of Cellulose Degradation by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.

Meagan C Burnet, Alice C Dohnalkova, Anthony P Neumann, Mary S Lipton, Richard D Smith, Garret Suen, Stephen J Callister

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Membrane vesicles can contribute to cellulose degradation bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meagan C BurnetBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, United States of America.
Alice C DohnalkovaEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, United States of America.
Anthony P NeumannDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States of America.
Mary S LiptonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, United States of America.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, United States of America.
Garret SuenDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States of America.
Stephen J CallisterBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, United States of America.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory · US

Funding

Microbial Pathogenesis &Host Responses Training ProgramT32AI055397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BRUCE STEVEN · 2003 to 2024
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI055397NIAID NIH HHS T32AI55397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 is an anaerobic non-cellulosome utilizing cellulolytic bacterium originally isolated from the cow rumen microbial community. Efforts to elucidate its cellulolytic machinery have resulted in the proposal of numerous models which involve cell-surface attachment via a combination of cellulose-binding fibro-slime proteins and pili, the production of cellulolytic vesicles, and the entry of cellulose fibers into the periplasmic space. Here, we used a combination of RNA-sequencing, proteomics, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to further clarify the cellulolytic mechanism of F. succinogenes. Our RNA-sequence analysis shows that genes encoding type II and III secretion systems, fibro-slime proteins, and pili are differentially expressed on cellulose, relative to glucose. A subcellular fractionation of cells grown on cellulose revealed that carbohydrate active enzymes associated with cellulose deconstruction and fibro-slime proteins were greater in the extracellular medium, as compared to the periplasm and outer membrane fractions. TEMs of samples harvested at mid-exponential and stationary phases of growth on cellulose and glucose showed the presence of grooves in the cellulose between the bacterial cells and substrate, suggesting enzymes work extracellularly for cellulose degradation. Membrane vesicles were only observed in stationary phase cultures grown on cellulose. These results provide evidence that F. succinogenes attaches to cellulose fibers using fibro-slime and pili, produces cellulases, such as endoglucanases, that are secreted extracellularly using type II and III secretion systems, and degrades the cellulose into cellodextrins that are then imported back into the periplasm for further digestion by β-glucanases and other cellulases.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsCelluloseFibrobacterFimbriae ProteinsPeriplasmProteomicsTranscriptomeBacterial ProteinsCelluloseFimbriae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26629814
PMCPMC4668043
OpenAlexW2292990072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.