ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Can BuCyE conditioning regimen be an alternative treatment to BEAM at autologous transplantation in malignant lymphoma patients?: a single center experience.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Mitoxantrone-melphalan conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory lymphomaTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Strategies to improve outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) applied together with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a commonly used treatment modality in patients with malignant lymphoma. At present, there is a limited number of studies which compare toxicity and efficacy of various high-dose regimens applied in the treatment of malignant lymphoma. For this reason, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of BuCyE (busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) preparative regimens in the patients with malignant lymphoma scheduled for autologous stem cell transplantation. Between November, 2010 and April, 2015, 42 patients with relapsed or refractory malignant lymphoma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation following BEAM (n=11) and BuCyE (n=31) preparative regimens were analyzed at Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of TurgutOzal Medicine Center in Turkey. The groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, hematopoietic engraftment time, toxicity profiles and survival. No significant differences were detected between the groups with regard to age, gender distribution, international prognostic index, ASCT indications, disease status at the time of ASCT and type of lymphoma (P>0.05). Median number of infused CD34+ cells/kg, neutrophil and platelet engraftment statuses of BuCyE and BEAM groups were found to be similar (P>0.05). More patients in BuCyE group developed mucositis and nausea, but this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). A similar statistically insignificant difference was seen in that infectious complications occurred more commonly in BEAM group (P>0.05). Overall survival and event-free survival rates were not significantly different between the groups (P>0.05). BuCyE is a conditioning regimen which can be effectively used as an alternative to BEAM in the patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing ASCT. Moreover, toxicity rates of both regimens are similar. In order to comprehend the effect of each HDC regimen, further evidence-based data obtained from the studies involving larger sample sizes are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26629149PMC4659037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.