ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Epidemiology and genotype distribution of high risk human papillomavirus in population of hospital opportunistic screening.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Factors influencing Chinese young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination: the mediating role of attitude.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer Patients in Riau Province Indonesia.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in population of hospital opportunistic screening and to identify the correlation of prevalent genotypes and cervical cytological abnormalities. A cross-sectional study was employed between July 2013 and July 2014 in the Chaoyang hospital, in Beijing. Cervical samples were collected for the Type-specific HPV and the cervical cytological analyses in the population of hospital opportunistic screening. Total of 8975 samples from female patients aged 17-86 years were tested. Of these, 10.4% were infected by HR-HPV, the highest prevalence of HR-HPV in the youngest group and decreasing with aging (X(2)=19.68, P=0.02). Of these, 78.73% were single infections and 21.27% were multiple infections. Age-specific prevalence of multiple HPV exhibited a "U" shaped curve (X(2)=19.98, P=0.018). The most prevalent genotype is HPV 52, then descending order of frequency were HPV-58, 16, 39, 51, 56, 59, 18, 31, 33, 35, 68 and 45. 15.9% had an abnormal cytology in HR-HPV positive women, vs 4.13% in HR-HPV negative women. The prevalence of HR-HPV were 9.2%, 26.8%, 32%, 35.3% and 36.4% in normal cell, ASCUS, LSIL, ASC-H and HSIL, respectively (X(2)=234.67, P=0.000). Women with HPV 52, 16, 18, 58, 39, 51, 59, 56, 33, 31 infections related to the abnormal cytology, while the HPV68, 45, 35 didn't. The prevalent characteristic in population of the hospital opportunistic screening is similar to the population of cervical screen, But the most five prevalent genotype in rank are different .Women with HR-HPV infections were more likely to have the cervical abnormal cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26629105PMC4658994W2192470204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.