ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and demographic, clinical, pathological, radiological factors in lung cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Role of [18F]FDG PET Imaging for the Assessment of Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Investigating the Clinico-Molecular and Immunological Evolution of Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Pseudotime Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Relationship between SP142 PD-L1 Expression andContrast media & molecular imaging · 2020Article
- The Contribution of FluorineMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2018Article
- Potential Utility of FDG PET-CT as a Non-invasive Tool for Monitoring Local Immune Responses.Journal of gastric cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives(18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is extensively used to diagnose and stage of lung cancer. The aim of the current study was to investigate the correlation of demographic, clinical, pathological and radiological factors with primer tumor FDG Uptake in patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional, clinical study was performed on a total of 57 lung cancer patients newly diagnosed that underwent FDG PET/CT. In addition to descriptive variables, histopathological diagnosis, tumor site and size, hemoglobin level, red cell distribution width, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were noted for each patient. The correlation of these variables to SUVmax values in FDG PET/CT was investigated.
resultsA total of 57 patients (4 women, 53 men) with an average age of 60.8±9.4 (range: 33-89) participated in the study. Histopathological diagnoses were consistent with squamous cell carcinoma (28, 49.1%), adenocarcinoma (15, 26.3%) and small cell cancer (14, 24.6%). The SUVmax of primary tumor was positively correlated with tumor size (P<0.001). The tumor SUVmax of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) (17.49±8.37) was higher than that of adenocarcinoma (AC) (12.80±4.77) and small cell carcinoma (SCC) (12.40±5.80) (P=0.038).
conclusionSUVmax value was significantly higher for squamous cell carcinoma and it SUVmax values in PET scans was found to be positively correlated with tumor size. This study suggests that, tumor size and histologic subtype had influences upon FDG uptake in lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26629078PMC4658967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.