Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26629058›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the detection of gastric carcinoma.

Jianxiao Liang, Hailian Lv, Qingwei Liu, Hongfu Li, Jiangquan Wang, Engang Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jianxiao LiangShandong University Jinan 250012, P. R. China ; Department of Radiology, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, P. R. China.
Hailian LvDepartment of MRI Division, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital Dongying 257034, P. R. China.
Qingwei LiuDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Jinan 250014, P. R. China.
Hongfu LiDepartment of Radiology, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, P. R. China.
Jiangquan WangDepartment of Medical Services, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, P. R. China.
Engang CuiDepartment of Radiology, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, P. R. China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNShengli Oilfield Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study evaluated the applicability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma (GC).

methodsFrom December, 2013 to December, 2014, 35 GC patients were selected from the Department of Oncology. Carcinomatous gastric tissues were collected as the case group, and normal gastric tissues were collected as the control group. The DW-MRI examination was performed on a 3.0-T GE Signa Excite MRI scanner. The ADC values of carcinomatous and normal gastric tissues were measured. A statistical meta-analysis was further performed.

resultsDW-MRI identified 75.0% (3/4) patients with T1, 75.0% (6/8) patients with T2, 86.4% (19/22) patients with T3, and 100.0% (1/1) patient with T4, showing an accuracy for T staging of 82.9% (29/35); identified 92.9% (13/14) patients of N0, 58.3% (7/12) patents of N1, 62.5% (5/8) patents of N2, and 100.0% (1/1) patients of N3, showing an accuracy for N staging of 74.3% (26/35). The average ADC value in the case group was apparently lower than the control group (P < 0.001); in the poorly differentiated group was lower than the moderately and well differentiated groups (F = 111.1, P < 0.001). Pairwise comparison of the average ADC value between the poorly, moderately and well differentiated groups showed statistical significance (all P < 0.05). Meta-analysis further confirmed a higher average ADC value in the case group than the control group (SMD = -4.136, 95% CI = -5.344~-2.928, P < 0.001).

conclusionDW-MRI is proved to be an attractive, noninvasive, quantitative and useful technique in the diagnosis and staging of GC.

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientdegree of differentiationdiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imagingGastric carcinomameta-analysisN stagingT staging

Identifiers

PMID26629058
PMCPMC4658947
OpenAlexW2194904809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.