Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26629025›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

The diagnosis value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for thyroid malignancy without highly suspicious features on conventional ultrasound.

Bo-Ji Liu, Feng Lu, Hui-Xiong Xu, Le-Hang Guo, Dan-Dan Li, Xiao-Wan Bo, Xiao-Long Li, Yi-Feng Zhang, Jun-Mei Xu, Xiao-Hong Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bo-Ji LiuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Feng LuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Hui-Xiong XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Medical College Affiliated Hospital Zhanjiang 524001, China.
Le-Hang GuoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Dan-Dan LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Xiao-Wan BoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Xiao-Long LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Yi-Feng ZhangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Jun-Mei XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Xiao-Hong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Medical College Affiliated Hospital Zhanjiang 524001, China.
Shen QuThyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the potential diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in identifying malignancy in nodules that do not appear highly suspicious on conventional ultrasound (US).

methods330 pathologically confirmed thyroid nodules (40 malignant and 290 benign; mean size, 22.0±11.6 mm) not suspicious of malignancy on conventional US in 330 patients (mean age 52.8±11.7 years) underwent ARFI elastography before surgery. ARFI elastography included qualitative ARFI-induced strain elastography (SE) and quantitative point shear wave elastography (p-SWE). ARFI-induced SE image was assessed by SE score, while p-SWE was denoted with shear wave velocity (SWV, m/s). The diagnostic performance of four criteria sets was evaluated: criteria set 1 (ARFI-induced SE), criteria set 2 (p-SWE), criteria set 3 (either set 1 or 2), criteria set 4 (both set 1 and 2). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance.

resultsSE score ≥4 was more frequently found in malignant nodules (32/40) than in benign nodules (30/290, P<0.001). The mean SWV of malignant nodules (3.64±2.23 m/s) was significantly higher than that of benign nodules (2.02±0.69 m/s) (P<0.001). ARFI-induced SE (set 1) had a sensitivity of 80.0% (32/40) and a specificity of 89.7% (260/290) with a cut-off point of SE score ≥4; p-SWE (set 2) had a sensitivity of 80.0% (32/40) and a specificity of 57.9% (168/290) with a cut-off point of SWV ≥2.15 m/s. When ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE were combined, set 3 had the highest sensitivity (92.5%, 37/40) while set 4 had the highest specificity (95.2%, 276/290).

conclusionARFI elastography can be used for differential diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules without highly suspicious features on US. The combination of ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE leads to improved sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

acoustic radiation force impulseelastographythyroidthyroid malignancyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID26629025
PMCPMC4658914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.