Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628979›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

XRCC1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in Caucasian populations: a meta-analysis.

Liangdong Chen, Deqiang Zhuo, Jiakuan Chen, Hongyin Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of DNA repair and xenobiotic pathway gene polymorphisms with genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer patients in West Bengal, India.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liangdong ChenDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, PR China.
Deqiang ZhuoDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, PR China.
Jiakuan ChenDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, PR China.
Hongyin YuanDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University Wuhan 430071, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) plays an important role in the base excision repair. Many studies have reported the association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp and Arg280His polymorphisms with lung cancer risk, but the results remained controversial. In this meta-analysis, we performed a meta-analysis of ten published case-control studies in Caucasian populations to investigate the associations between lung cancer risk and XRCC1 Arg399Gln (2187 cases and 3453 controls from ten studies), Arg194Trp (857 cases and 2108 controls from six studies) and Arg280His (894 cases and 1133 controls from five studies). The results in total population showed that XRCC1 codon 399 polymorphism (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.82-1.04) and codon 194 (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.73-1.21) was significantly associated with lung cancer risk. However, no association was found between lung cancer risk and codon 280 (OR=1.17, 95% CI=0.89-1.54). In conclusion, this meta-analysis has demonstrated that codon 399 and codon 194 might have contributed to individual susceptibility to lung cancer in Caucasian populations. To further evaluate effect of XRCC1 polymorphisms, large studies with thousands of subjects are required to get conclusive results.

Indexed as

lung cancermeta-analysispolymorphismX-ray repair cross-complementing group 1

Identifiers

PMID26628979
PMCPMC4658868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.