Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628902›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2015

Third-line antiretroviral therapy in Africa: effectiveness in a Southern African retrospective cohort study.

Graeme Meintjes, Liezl Dunn, Marla Coetsee, Michael Hislop, Rory Leisegang, Leon Regensberg, Gary Maartens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adult antiretroviral therapy guidelines 2017.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Graeme MeintjesClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative (CIDRI), Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa ; Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa ; Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Liezl DunnAid for AIDS Management, Afrocentric Health Pty Ltd, The Boulevard, Block G, Searle Street, Woodstock, 7925 South Africa.
Marla CoetseeAid for AIDS Management, Afrocentric Health Pty Ltd, The Boulevard, Block G, Searle Street, Woodstock, 7925 South Africa.
Michael HislopAid for AIDS Management, Afrocentric Health Pty Ltd, The Boulevard, Block G, Searle Street, Woodstock, 7925 South Africa.
Rory LeisegangDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital Old Main Building, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa.
Leon RegensbergAid for AIDS Management, Afrocentric Health Pty Ltd, The Boulevard, Block G, Searle Street, Woodstock, 7925 South Africa.
Gary MaartensDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital Old Main Building, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of patients in Africa are experiencing virologic failure on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) and those who develop resistance to protease inhibitors (PI) will require third-line ART, but no data on the outcomes of third-line are available from the region. We assessed the virologic outcomes and survival of patients started on salvage ART in a Southern African private sector disease management programme.

methodsRetrospective observational cohort study with linkage to the national death register. Adults (≥18 years) who started salvage ART between July 2007 and December 2011 were included. Salvage ART was defined by inclusion of darunavir or tipranavir in an ART regimen after having failed another PI. For Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, patients were followed up until event, or censored at death (only for virologic outcomes), leaving the programme, or April 2014.

results152 patients were included. Subtype was known for 113 patients: 111 (98 %) were infected with subtype C. All 152 had a genotype resistance test demonstrating major PI resistance mutations. Salvage drugs included were: darunavir/ritonavir (n = 149), tipranavir/ritonavir (n = 3), raltegravir (n = 58), and etravirine (n = 8). Median follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR = 1.5-3.3). 82.9 % achieved a viral load ≤400 copies/ml and 71.1 % ≤50 copies/ml. By the end of the study 17 (11.2 %) of the patients had died. The KM estimate of cumulative survival was 87.2 % at 2000 days.

conclusionsVirologic suppression was comparable to that demonstrated in clinical trials and observational studies of salvage ART drugs conducted in other regions. Few deaths occurred during short term follow-up. Third-line regimens for patients with multidrug resistant subtype C HIV in Africa are virologically and clinically effective.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral therapyHIVHuman immunodeficiency virusSalvageThird-lineVirologic failure

Identifiers

PMID26628902
PMCPMC4666151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.