Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628528›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Junior doctors' experiences of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative study.

Katherine Yon, Sarah Nettleton, Kate Walters, Kethakie Lamahewa, Marta Buszewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 'I think it is helpful … I mean it's not always helpful' - diagnostic complexity in endometriosis: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  11. The challenge of persistent physical symptoms.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine YonResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Sarah NettletonDepartment of Sociology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5184-2764
Kate WaltersResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Kethakie LamahewaResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Marta BuszewiczResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore junior doctors' knowledge about and experiences of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and to seek their recommendations for improved future training on this important topic about which they currently receive little education.

designQualitative study using in-depth interviews analysed using the framework method.

settingParticipants were recruited from three North Thames London hospitals within the UK.

participantsTwenty-two junior doctors undertaking the UK foundation two-year training programme (FY1/FY2).

resultsThe junior doctors interviewed identified a significant gap in their training on the topic of MUS, particularly in relation to their awareness of the topic, the appropriate level of investigations, possible psychological comorbidities, the formulation of suitable explanations for patients' symptoms and longer term management strategies. Many junior doctors expressed feelings of anxiety, frustration and a self-perceived lack of competency in this area, and spoke of over-investigating patients or avoiding patient contact altogether due to the challenging nature of MUS and a difficulty in managing the accompanying uncertainty. They also identified the negative attitudes of some senior clinicians and potential role models towards patients with MUS as a factor contributing to their own attitudes and management choices. Most reported a need for more training during the foundation years, and recommended interactive case-based group discussions with a focus on providing meaningful explanations to patients for their symptoms.

conclusionsThere is an urgent need to improve postgraduate training about the topics of MUS and avoiding over-investigation, as current training does not equip junior doctors with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively and confidently manage patients in these areas. Training needs to focus on practical skill development to increase clinical knowledge in areas such as delivering suitable explanations, and to incorporate individual management strategies to help junior doctors tolerate the uncertainty associated with MUS.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLondonMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedProfessional CompetenceQualitative ResearchSomatoform DisordersYoung AdultJUNIOR DOCTORSMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGMEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMSMENTAL HEALTHPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID26628528
PMCPMC4679901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.