Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628527›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Study protocol for a phase III multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin plus cyclosporin A in patients with severe Kawasaki disease (KAICA Trial).

Reiko Aoyagi, Hiromichi Hamada, Yasunori Sato, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Onouchi, Ryota Ebata, Kengo Nagashima, Moe Terauchi, Masaru Terai, Hideki Hanaoka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. Antibodies and Immunity During Kawasaki Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Refractory Kawasaki disease: diagnostic and management challenges.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Adjunctive therapies in Kawasaki disease.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Kawasaki disease: etiopathogenesis and novel treatment strategies.Expert review of clinical immunology · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Reiko AoyagiClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hiromichi HamadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan.
Yasunori SatoClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuzukiDepartment of Pediatrics, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yoshihiro OnouchiDepartment of Public Health, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Ryota EbataDepartment of Pediatrics, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Kengo NagashimaClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4529-9045
Moe TerauchiClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Masaru TeraiDepartment of Pediatrics, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan.
Hideki HanaokaClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Akira HataDepartment of Public Health, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
KAICA Trial Investigators
Chiba University Hospital · JPChiba University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKawasaki disease (KD) is an acute, self-limited vasculitis of unknown aetiology that predominantly affects infants and young children. We hypothesise that cyclosporin A (CsA) may be effective in treating KD by regulating the Ca(2+)/NFAT signalling pathway. This trial compares the current standard therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and the combined IVIG+CsA therapy in paediatric patients with severe KD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a phase III, multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of IVIG+CsA therapy. Patients with severe KD who satisfy the eligibility criteria are randomised (1:1) to receive either CsA (5 mg/kg/day for 5 days; Neoral) plus high-dose IVIG (2 g/kg for 24 h and aspirin 30 mg/kg/day), or high-dose IVIG alone (2 g/kg for 24 h and aspirin 30 mg/kg/day). The primary end point is the frequency of occurrence of coronary artery abnormalities during the trial period. An independent end point review committee will be in charge of the trial assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each institution. The trial was notified and registered at the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency, in Japan. The trial is currently on-going and is scheduled to finish in April 2017. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JMA-IIA00174; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Research DesignAspirinCalcineurin InhibitorsChild, PreschoolCyclosporineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousInfantJapanMaleMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromeProportional Hazards ModelsTreatment OutcomeAspirinCalcineurin InhibitorsCyclosporineImmunoglobulins, IntravenousCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID26628527
PMCPMC4679944
OpenAlexW2272728847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.